2022
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotinylated Polymer-Ruthenium Conjugates: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Model

Abstract: The need for new therapeutic approaches for triple-negative breast cancer is a clinically relevant problem that needs to be solved. Using a multi-targeting approach to enhance cancer cell uptake, we synthesized a new family of ruthenium(II) organometallic complexes envisaging simultaneous active and passive targeting, using biotin and polylactide (PLA), respectively. All compounds with the general formula, [Ru(η5-CpR)(P)(2,2′-bipy-4,4′-PLA-biotin)][CF3SO3], where R is -H or -CH3 and P is P(C6H5)3, P(C6H4F)3 or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It measures the growth and/or proliferation inhibitory potency in cultured cells, thereby estimating the cytotoxicity of a complex. While the in vitro assay is certainly the easiest and most cost-effective, it does not take into account the essential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes that operate in vivo and therefore fails to predict the true (pre)­clinical potential of a drug candidate. Several highly cytotoxic metal complexes identified using cell-based in vitro assay failed to show appreciable antitumor activity in animal xenograft models due to poor pharmacokinetics. Therefore, along with in vitro cytotoxicity screening, it is essential to evaluate the lead candidates for tolerability, efficacy, biodistribution, toxicity, etc., in suitable animal models at the early developmental stage of any new class of anticancer agent for assessing the true potential to enter (pre)­clinical studies. Encouragingly, in recent times, more and more metal-based antitumor agents have been investigated using a combination of in vitro as well as in vivo assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It measures the growth and/or proliferation inhibitory potency in cultured cells, thereby estimating the cytotoxicity of a complex. While the in vitro assay is certainly the easiest and most cost-effective, it does not take into account the essential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes that operate in vivo and therefore fails to predict the true (pre)­clinical potential of a drug candidate. Several highly cytotoxic metal complexes identified using cell-based in vitro assay failed to show appreciable antitumor activity in animal xenograft models due to poor pharmacokinetics. Therefore, along with in vitro cytotoxicity screening, it is essential to evaluate the lead candidates for tolerability, efficacy, biodistribution, toxicity, etc., in suitable animal models at the early developmental stage of any new class of anticancer agent for assessing the true potential to enter (pre)­clinical studies. Encouragingly, in recent times, more and more metal-based antitumor agents have been investigated using a combination of in vitro as well as in vivo assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also demonstrated the impressive antimigratory, anti-invasive, and antiangiogenic properties of Ru-IM in TNBC cell lines . Cellular uptake studies showed good overall cellular uptake, with subcellular studies revealing increased mitochondria accumulation (52.7%) Preliminary in vivo efficacy studies of Ru-IM in a MDA-MB-231 mouse xenograft model (female NOD.SCID mice) afforded 56% tumor reduction following a 28-day efficacy trial with a dosing schedule of 5 mg/kg every other day. , While tumor growth inhibition in TNBC mouse models has been reported for other metal-based compounds, tumor shrinkage in these in vivo models is unique to Ru-IM . Further evaluation also showed low systemic toxicity, with preferential accumulation of Ru in tumor tissue .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…26 Note that many other ruthenium complexes also display activity against breast cancers in vivo. [27][28][29] Since RAPTA compounds display promising activity in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells but are not strongly cytotoxic, we hypothesized that more cytotoxic RAPTAlike complexes might offer enhanced activity against breast cancers while potentially retaining selectivity. Hence, we report a study assessing the in vitro effects of a series of rutheniumarene (RAPTA-type or RAPTA-like) compounds on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines and non-tumorigenic L929 fibroblasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Note that many other ruthenium complexes also display activity against breast cancers in vivo. 27–29…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%