1976
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.120.361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotransformation of methylmercury in vitro.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most probable alternative sites of CHaHgCl metabolism are the liver and kidney, since chopped tissue preparations of these organs have been shown to possess the ability to metabolize methylmercury. 17 Our results are in agreement with those of Nakamura et al,10 who showed, using germ-free and conventional mice, that in the former animals Hg excretion was decreased in the feces after a single oral dose of CHaHgCI, and that there were increases in the amounts of Hg accumulated in certain organs. Norseth' s 3, conflicting findings that there were no differences in biotransformation of CHa HgCI in germ-free and conventional rats might not be entirely valid, since the route of administration was not oral (which gives the maximum opportunity for the gut flora to metabolize the mercurial), but subcutaneous.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The most probable alternative sites of CHaHgCl metabolism are the liver and kidney, since chopped tissue preparations of these organs have been shown to possess the ability to metabolize methylmercury. 17 Our results are in agreement with those of Nakamura et al,10 who showed, using germ-free and conventional mice, that in the former animals Hg excretion was decreased in the feces after a single oral dose of CHaHgCI, and that there were increases in the amounts of Hg accumulated in certain organs. Norseth' s 3, conflicting findings that there were no differences in biotransformation of CHa HgCI in germ-free and conventional rats might not be entirely valid, since the route of administration was not oral (which gives the maximum opportunity for the gut flora to metabolize the mercurial), but subcutaneous.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2,3) Intestinal flora plays important roles not only in decomposition of organic mercury (o-Hg) but also in fecal excretion of total mercury (t-Hg) in animals administered methylmercury as reviewed by Rowland 4) and Tanaka-Kagawa, 5) though animal tissues can decompose methylmercury in vitro [6][7][8] and in vivo. [9][10][11] In the case of phenylmercury, the mercury was decomposed much faster than methylmercury, and intestinal flora did not participate in the decomposition nor in the fecal excretion of mercury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) No studies have dealt with the role of selenite in methylmercury degradation in vivo, but a few experiments have suggested increased degrada tion. 3,4) This study aimed to examine the role of co administered selenite and methylmercury in in organic mercury accumulation by changing the dose of selenite.…”
Section: Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%