2020
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioturbation by a reintroduced digging mammal reduces fuel loads in an urban reserve

Abstract: Digging animals may alter many characteristics of their environment as they disrupt and modify the ground's surface by creating foraging pits or burrows. Extensive disturbance to the soil and litter layer changes litter distribution and availability, potentially altering fuel loads. In many landscapes, including peri‐urban areas, fire management to reduce fuel loads is complex and challenging. The reintroduction of previously common digging animals, many of which are now threatened, may have the added benefit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many threatened wildlife species have highly disjunct distributions with little to no natural gene flow between populations, and translocations are critical for their long-term demographic and genetic stability [21]. Reintroducing populations within the historical range of a species or establishing populations beyond the historical range in low-threat areas (such as predator-free islands or reserves) are increasingly common [30,56,57]. Using predictive models to guide the founding of isolated populations with ongoing translocations is critical to maximising species-wide genetic variation [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many threatened wildlife species have highly disjunct distributions with little to no natural gene flow between populations, and translocations are critical for their long-term demographic and genetic stability [21]. Reintroducing populations within the historical range of a species or establishing populations beyond the historical range in low-threat areas (such as predator-free islands or reserves) are increasingly common [30,56,57]. Using predictive models to guide the founding of isolated populations with ongoing translocations is critical to maximising species-wide genetic variation [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence indicates that removal of large grazing mammals in Africa and North America alters ecosystem structure and increases fire activity (57). Indeed, our review of IUCN Red List data indicates that modification of fire activity has contributed to the recent extinction of 37 species, including a suite of fossorial marsupials in Australia whose digging activity influences fire regimes (58).…”
Section: Biotic Mixingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Reintroduction of species that have key functional roles offers an innovative opportunity to promote ecological processes that moderate fire regimes (57). For example, the reintroduction of a digging marsupial (Isoodon fusciventer) in an urban reserve in Western Australia led to significant reduction of surface fuel loads and the predicted rate of fire spread (58). Digging animals modify fuels by creating foraging pits and burrows: the reintroduction of previously common digging species is an exciting prospect for restoring fire-prone ecosystems (58).…”
Section: [Table 1 Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative to many ecological and evolutionary timescales, the impact of the shutdown may only be a blip on the radar. Perhaps an uptick in movement of urban wildlife will temporarily boost gene flow among wildlife populations or help species re‐establish on isolated islands of urban green space, resetting some equilibria (Ryan et al 2020). If changes in body condition, reproduction, and survival of wildlife occur because animals are better able to exploit the urban environment during the shutdown, this might lead to population‐, community‐, or ecosystem‐level processes in the following year such as increased population sizes or altered trophic dynamics (Shochat et al 2006).…”
Section: Key Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%