2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipaddle pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in reconstructing full thickness defects of cheek: a review of 47 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Furthermore, in view of the long operative time, the need for expertise and infrastructure, and the large work volume in developing countries, microsurgical reconstruction cannot be offered to all patients with such defects. 18 The basics of the platysma myocutaneous flap, which was first used for the reconstruction of intraoral defects nearly 30 years ago, have been used for various head and neck defects. 19 The platysma myocutaneous flap was first introduced by Futrell et al in 1978 20 and Coleman et al in 1983 21 for the reconstruction of a variety of head, face and oral defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Furthermore, in view of the long operative time, the need for expertise and infrastructure, and the large work volume in developing countries, microsurgical reconstruction cannot be offered to all patients with such defects. 18 The basics of the platysma myocutaneous flap, which was first used for the reconstruction of intraoral defects nearly 30 years ago, have been used for various head and neck defects. 19 The platysma myocutaneous flap was first introduced by Futrell et al in 1978 20 and Coleman et al in 1983 21 for the reconstruction of a variety of head, face and oral defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although medially based deltopectoral flap, trapezius, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi flaps are mentioned for cheek reconstruction, microvascular transfer frequently provides a better result for large defects than those pedicled regional alternatives. [9][10][11][12] Microvascular free flaps have several advantages: well vascularized tissue distant from an irradiated field, contourability, large volume, and more accurate replacement of specific tissues. Among free flaps, radial forearm free flap with or without palmaris longus suspension, tensor fascia lata free flap, and parascapular free flap are the most widely utilized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the relative ease of its harvesting, sturdy nature, reliable vascularity and ability to provide bulk, various modifications of this flap have been advocated over time to adapt to the various intricacies of the recipient site such as an osteomyocutaneous variety, 4 innervated flap, 5 bipaddle flap 1 to name a few.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%