2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-018-1805-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biphasic effect of abstinence duration following cocaine self-administration on spine morphology and plasticity-related proteins in prelimbic cortical neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens core

Abstract: Cocaine self-administration (SA) in rats dysregulates glutamatergic signaling in the prelimbic (PrL) cortex and glutamate release in the nucleus accumbens (NA) core, promoting cocaine seeking. PrL adaptations that affect relapse to drug seeking emerge during the first week of abstinence; switching from an early (2 hr) hypoglutamatergic state to a later (7 days) hyperglutamatergic state. Different interventions that normalize glutamatergic signaling in PrL cortex at each timepoint are necessary to suppress rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cocaine may be a more salient reinforcer than sucrose, thereby differentially engaging mPFC subregions based on some motivational intensity gradient, although see Lenoir et al (2007). Another possible explanation is that repeated cocaine induces neuroplastic changes in the mPFC that results in differential regulation of seeking behavior relative to natural rewards (Robinson and Kolb, 1999; Robinson et al, 2001; McFarland et al, 2003; Muñoz-Cuevas et al, 2013; Radley et al, 2015; Siemsen et al, 2019). Cocaine also induces both appetitive and aversive behaviors (Ettenberg, 2004), whereas there are fewer aversive components to sucrose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocaine may be a more salient reinforcer than sucrose, thereby differentially engaging mPFC subregions based on some motivational intensity gradient, although see Lenoir et al (2007). Another possible explanation is that repeated cocaine induces neuroplastic changes in the mPFC that results in differential regulation of seeking behavior relative to natural rewards (Robinson and Kolb, 1999; Robinson et al, 2001; McFarland et al, 2003; Muñoz-Cuevas et al, 2013; Radley et al, 2015; Siemsen et al, 2019). Cocaine also induces both appetitive and aversive behaviors (Ettenberg, 2004), whereas there are fewer aversive components to sucrose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All animal use protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Medical University of South Carolina (animal use protocol # 107,172) and were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th ed., 2011). On the day of surgery, rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal ketamine (66 mg/kg) and xylazine (1.33 mg/kg) injection (Siemsen, Giannotti, McFaddin, Scofield, & McGinty, ), and received ketorolac (Sigma Catalog number #K1136, 2 mg/kg, i.p.) for analgesia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats in experiment 1 were secured in a stereotaxic apparatus (David Kopf Instruments, model 942) and received a bilateral intra‐prelimbic (PL) cortical (AP: +2.8 mm, ML: ±0.6 mm, DV: −3.8 mm relative to bregma) microinjection of either a chemogenetic or reporter‐only control vector (see materials). Rats in experiments 2 and 4 received a chronic indwelling jugular silastic catheter surgery as described previously (Siemsen, Giannotti, et al, ; Siemsen, Lombroso, & McGinty, ; Siemsen et al, ), and received a single intravenous infusion of Cefazolin to prevent bacterial infection. All rats received a unilateral intra‐NAcore guide cannula (BASi, Catalog number #7030; Pinnacle Technology) implantation following 4 weeks of virus expression (Experiment 1), immediately following catheterization (Experiment 2), in lieu of catheterization (Experiment 3), or 24 hr following the final cocaine SA session (Experiment 4, see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care was taken to ensure that the majority of each astrocyte in the Z-plane was imaged. In experiment 2, apical tuft dendrites of layer V PrL-NAcore neurons were imaged as previously described [30]. Briefly, dendritic spine segments were imaged only if they met the following criteria: 1: they could be traced back to the cell body of origin, 2: they were unobscured by neighboring dendritic segments, and 3: they were past the bifurcation of the proximal dendrite (terminating in layers I and II).…”
Section: Confocal Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%