1984
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(84)90055-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipolar diffusion charging of aerosol particles—II. Influence of the concentration ratio of positive and negative ions on the charge distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained with the Boltzmann distribution could be quite different from those obtained with other reasonable charge distributions for other circumstances, for example, for nonequilibrium aerosols or for particles that are in equilibrium in an ionic atmosphere that is not purely bipolar, not having equal diffusivities among the ionic species (see, for example, Porstendorfer et al, 1984;Adachi et al, 1985). In the atmosphere, the negative ions tend to have higher mobility and diffusivity than the positive ions, leading to about a factor of two more negative than positive charge on particles much smaller than 1 pm (Adachi et al, 1985).…”
Section: Aerosol Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Results obtained with the Boltzmann distribution could be quite different from those obtained with other reasonable charge distributions for other circumstances, for example, for nonequilibrium aerosols or for particles that are in equilibrium in an ionic atmosphere that is not purely bipolar, not having equal diffusivities among the ionic species (see, for example, Porstendorfer et al, 1984;Adachi et al, 1985). In the atmosphere, the negative ions tend to have higher mobility and diffusivity than the positive ions, leading to about a factor of two more negative than positive charge on particles much smaller than 1 pm (Adachi et al, 1985).…”
Section: Aerosol Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This charge distribution is obviously much different from that shown in Figure 2 and illustrates that for real situations where aerosols are neutralized in a region of high ionization, we should expect the charge distribution to be asymmetric. See also Porstendorfer et al (1984).…”
Section: High Ionization Rate-asymmetric Chargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moon (1984) measured the charge distribution of diesel exhaust particles by a combination of a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) and an electrical aerosol analyzer (EAA) but the resolution of the EAA limits the power of this method. Another approach combining a DMA and an optical aerosol spectrometer was used (Porstendorfer et al 1984) but the particle sizes were relatively large (0.5-2 µm) due to limitations of the optical aerosol spectrometer. Integral techniques (Forsyth et al 1998) have been used but they cannot distinguish the charge polarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%