2017
DOI: 10.12700/aph.14.3.2017.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipolar Rating Scales: A Survey and Novel Correlation Measures Based on Nonlinear Bipolar Scoring Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because discrepancy scores are a bipolar, rather than unipolar, scale, this may raise some issues with the use of correlations (Batyrshin et al, 2017). Moreover, correlations do not indicate how under- and overestimation of abilities relate to autistic traits and mental health outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because discrepancy scores are a bipolar, rather than unipolar, scale, this may raise some issues with the use of correlations (Batyrshin et al, 2017). Moreover, correlations do not indicate how under- and overestimation of abilities relate to autistic traits and mental health outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categorical labels are randomly assigned ordered integer values 1-N in consistent distribution. On the other hand, most of the relative bipolar label sets take values of a five-point scale (ranging from 1 to 5) to reflect the degree of strength, whereas the others are designed to take only a three-point scale (ranging from 1 to 3) to avoid uncertainty and overestimate such traits [33]. Table 2 shows the proposed list of soft ear biometrics with their semantic labels derived from a human ear, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Soft Ear Biometric Traits 321 Fine-grained Soft Ear Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krebs (2012) found higher Cronbach's Alpha in bipolar rating scales, while Menold and Raykov (2016) found higher reliability in a unipolar application dimension than in bipolar DA ratings. Researchers also addressed bimodality in bipolar rating scales (Batyrshin et al 2017), which can additionally affect measurement quality. In the present research, besides reliability, we expect bipolar rating scales to negatively affect validity and equidistance:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%