2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird community assembly in Bornean industrial tree plantations: Effects of forest age and structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
59
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, analysis of the data from the 24 poplar plantations revealed significant differences between poplar plantation types, with bird species richness being lowest in adult and harrowed stands and highest in the young harrowed stands, suggesting an inverse effect of stand age in harrowed stands. This contrasts with the findings of other studies conducted in tree plantations worldwide, which reported an increase in bird species richness and abundance with increasing stand age (Lance et al 1996;Hanowski et al 1997;Vanhinsbergh et al 2002;Barbaro et al 2005;Styring et al 2011). Here, this contrasting pattern could result from an indirect effect of understorey vegetation which is known to benefit forest birds (Mills et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, analysis of the data from the 24 poplar plantations revealed significant differences between poplar plantation types, with bird species richness being lowest in adult and harrowed stands and highest in the young harrowed stands, suggesting an inverse effect of stand age in harrowed stands. This contrasts with the findings of other studies conducted in tree plantations worldwide, which reported an increase in bird species richness and abundance with increasing stand age (Lance et al 1996;Hanowski et al 1997;Vanhinsbergh et al 2002;Barbaro et al 2005;Styring et al 2011). Here, this contrasting pattern could result from an indirect effect of understorey vegetation which is known to benefit forest birds (Mills et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Nevertheless, the spatial scale at which birds select their habitat remains a matter of debate. Although several authors have pointed out that landscape is the most relevant scale accounting for turnover in bird communities (Christian et al 1998;Saab 1999;Bennett et al 2004;Barbaro et al 2007), others have reported that bird communities are mainly influenced by habitat patch features (MacFaden and Capen 2002;Loyn et al 2007;Styring et al 2011) or that local and landscape variables are equally influential (Herrando and Brotons 2002;Moreira et al 2005;Coreau and Martin 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figure 2) dominated the HS1, because there were plants bearing fruits. Chalcophaps indica belonged to the family of Columbidae and frugivorous (Styring et al 2011;British Trust of Ornithologist 2014(2014. This group of birds was adaptable to the season of fruits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversification of tree species or age ranges either between stands in a forested landscape or within stands at a smaller scale generally enhances habitat provision for invertebrates such as arboreal beetles, and for birds and mammals (Nikula et al 2004;Plath et al 2012;Styring et al 2011). Mixtures of conifers and deciduous trees may enhance biodiversity by providing habitats suitable for species associated with different tree species.…”
Section: Habitat Provisioning Across Forested Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%