2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird community responses along urban–rural gradients: Does the size of the urbanized area matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
70
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In Finland, zig-zag walks through study plots of 30 ha were conducted (see Jokimäki & Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki 2003), whereas in Argentina, between five and nine transects of 100 m long and 50 m wide separated by at least 200 m (about 35 ha of extension) were surveyed in each study plot. Surveys using a single visit are an accepted method in urban areas (Jokimäki & Suhonen 1998;Garaffa et al 2008). For example, according to Jokimäki and Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki (2003), the results based on the single-visit survey are highly comparable to the results obtained during the five-visit survey conducted during the winter in urban areas.…”
Section: Bird Surveysmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In Finland, zig-zag walks through study plots of 30 ha were conducted (see Jokimäki & Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki 2003), whereas in Argentina, between five and nine transects of 100 m long and 50 m wide separated by at least 200 m (about 35 ha of extension) were surveyed in each study plot. Surveys using a single visit are an accepted method in urban areas (Jokimäki & Suhonen 1998;Garaffa et al 2008). For example, according to Jokimäki and Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki (2003), the results based on the single-visit survey are highly comparable to the results obtained during the five-visit survey conducted during the winter in urban areas.…”
Section: Bird Surveysmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Natural; Table 2) data from each point count station and their distance from the city centre (Garaffa et al, 2009;Du Toit and Cilliers, 2011). We then used the first two factors resulting from the PCA to correlate the gradient with the community parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each point count station was placed entirely within a green area. Hence, (Fuller and Langslow, 1984;Bibby and Burgess, 1992;Sorace et al, 2000), reduced to 5 for point count from the original 10' and repeated twice during the breeding season in 2005 (early period: March-April; late period: May-June) (Garaffa et al, 2009;Gagné and Fahrig, 2011). In order to optimise our data set we surveyed early and late breeders and also species with different phenology (migrant and resident species).…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A abundância tende a ser maior em níveis intermediários de urbanização (Garaffa et al, 2009;Villegas & Garitano-Zavala, 2010) ou apresenta o seu valor máximo em altas intensidades de urbanização (Clergeau et al, 1998). Um dos motivos é o aumento na abundância de espécies sinantrópicas (Donnelly & Marzluff, 2006), sugerindo que comunidades de aves tornam-se cada vez mais densas, porém empobrecidas à medida que aumenta a intensidade de urbanização.…”
unclassified