1984
DOI: 10.2307/3801783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird Populations and Vegetation Characteristics in Managed and Old-Growth Forests, Northeastern Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hansen et al (1995b) using bird abundance data from several studies in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, suggested that most forest birds can be placed in four guilds in terms of overstory tree canopy density: open canopy species (e.g., Dark-eyed Junco and American Robin); open canopy with dispersed large trees (e.g., MacGillivray7s Warbler, Hammond's Flycatcher, and Western Tanager); structurally complex closed-canopy (e.g., Brown Creeper, Chestnut-backed Chickadee and Winter Wren); and structurally simple closedcanopy species (e.g., Golden-crowned Kinglet and Swainson's Thrush). Our results, and those of Mannan and Meslow (1984), Adam et al (1996), andHagar et al (1996) in the northwestern U.S.A., and Annand and Thompson (1997) in hardwood forests of Missouri, supported that conceptualization. By varying the intensity and spatial pattern (dispersed or clumped) of timber harvest within a stand, forest managers can create the range of conditions favoured by the different guilds.…”
Section: Birdssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Hansen et al (1995b) using bird abundance data from several studies in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, suggested that most forest birds can be placed in four guilds in terms of overstory tree canopy density: open canopy species (e.g., Dark-eyed Junco and American Robin); open canopy with dispersed large trees (e.g., MacGillivray7s Warbler, Hammond's Flycatcher, and Western Tanager); structurally complex closed-canopy (e.g., Brown Creeper, Chestnut-backed Chickadee and Winter Wren); and structurally simple closedcanopy species (e.g., Golden-crowned Kinglet and Swainson's Thrush). Our results, and those of Mannan and Meslow (1984), Adam et al (1996), andHagar et al (1996) in the northwestern U.S.A., and Annand and Thompson (1997) in hardwood forests of Missouri, supported that conceptualization. By varying the intensity and spatial pattern (dispersed or clumped) of timber harvest within a stand, forest managers can create the range of conditions favoured by the different guilds.…”
Section: Birdssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Most abundant in large undisturbed tracts of contiguous forest, but will also use forests in late successional stages (Mannan and Meslow 1984, Kessler and Kogut 1985. In the Tanana Valley of interior Alaska, this species is largely restricted to mature white spruce forests where breeding density is positively related to the density and dominance of white spruce .…”
Section: Partners In Flight Alaska Biogeographic Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of cavity trees is considered one of the most important factors to the success of populations of cavity-nesting birds and is of increasing concern because of removal of cavity trees and snags under intensive timber management (McClelland and Frissell 1975). Several studies revealed an adverse impact of timber management on cavity tree resources and thus on cavity-dependent birds and wildlife (Conner et al 1975;Cline et al 1980;McComb and Nobel 1980;Mannan and Meslow 1984;Zarnowitz and Manuwal 1985). Resource managers are often required to incorporate the habitat requirements of cavity-using wildlife into management plans and assess trade-offs between wildlife and timber resource goals (Loehle et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%