2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BIRNet: Brain image registration using dual-supervised fully convolutional networks

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach for image registration by predicting deformation from image appearance. Since obtaining ground-truth deformation fields for training can be challenging, we design a fully convolutional network that is subject to dual-guidance: (1) Coarse guidance using deformation fields obtained by an existing registration method; and (2) Fine guidance using image similarity. The latter guidance helps avoid overly relying on the supervision from the training deformation field… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
151
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using our method with a non-generative U-net style network [55] without a deformation encoding performed similarly compared to the proposed generative model. Adding supervised information such as segmentation masks in the training procedure as in [26], [29] led to a marginal increase in terms of registration performance (∼1-2% in DICE scores), so we decided that the performance gain is not large enough in order to justify the higher training complexity. Theoretically, our method allows measurement of registration uncertainty as proposed in [27] which we did not further investigate in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using our method with a non-generative U-net style network [55] without a deformation encoding performed similarly compared to the proposed generative model. Adding supervised information such as segmentation masks in the training procedure as in [26], [29] led to a marginal increase in terms of registration performance (∼1-2% in DICE scores), so we decided that the performance gain is not large enough in order to justify the higher training complexity. Theoretically, our method allows measurement of registration uncertainty as proposed in [27] which we did not further investigate in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using an image similarity, Hu et al [29] proposed to optimize the matching of labels based on a multi-scale DICE loss and a deformation regularization. Fan et al [26] proposed to jointly optimize a supervised and unsupervised objective by regressing ground-truth deformation fields (from an existing algorithm), while simultaneously optimizing an intensity-based similarity criterion. The disadvantage of these semi-supervised approaches is that their training complexity is higher since label information needs to be collected, and for example deformations outside the segmented areas are not guaranteed to be captured.…”
Section: A Deformable Image Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registration network follows the same architecture in [7], which is a hierarchical U-Net regression model [8]. The network takes 3D patches from the subject and template images as input and produces the deformation fields associated with the patches as output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other supervised methods were presented by [6] who showed a network for predicting the momentum of large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping model, [7] who presented a network for the registration of magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the brain and [8], [9] showed a method for pulmonary CT registration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%