1978
DOI: 10.1177/028418517801901b06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth Injuries to the Epiphyseal Cartilage

Abstract: A birth injury in the vicinity of a joint might lead to a fracture through the epiphyseal cartilage. The criteria for diagnosing such a fracture at radiography are considered and the continued remodelling of the bone demonstrated. The history of 2 cases with late diagnosis and serious long-term sequelae are described, in order to emphasize the necessity of early radiography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this relationship cannot be ascertained radiographically in neonates because the epiphysis is still cartilaginous. Thus, radiography is inconclusive in distinguishing between dislocation and fracture-separation [6,7,14,15]. Elbow arthrography, which delineates the cartilaginous epiphysis, may demonstrate the injury, but the investigation is invasive and there is a risk of infection [10,12,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this relationship cannot be ascertained radiographically in neonates because the epiphysis is still cartilaginous. Thus, radiography is inconclusive in distinguishing between dislocation and fracture-separation [6,7,14,15]. Elbow arthrography, which delineates the cartilaginous epiphysis, may demonstrate the injury, but the investigation is invasive and there is a risk of infection [10,12,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 20 cases of fracture-separation of the distal humeral epiphysis in newborns have been described since 1963 [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The probable reason for this paucity of reports is that the injury is often misdiagnosed clinically and radiologically and is therefore underreported [3,7,13,14]. The ossification center of the capitellum appears only at 3-9 months of age; before this, its alignment with the head of the radius cannot be ascertained radiographically [3,6,7,10,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the fracture extends through part of the metaphysis, a tiny bone fragment separates and may appear on the standard radiograph. 1 Recent utilization of ultrasonography, [3][4][5] or computed tomography 2 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2,5 have offered promise in facilitating a more timely diagnosis. Consideration of specific high-risk perinatal factors may also lead to earlier suspicion of this lesion.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slipped epiphysis due to birth injury represents a rare condition with diagnostic problems [1,2]. With no epiphyseal ossification center and most commonly a fracture type I corresponding to Salter and Harris [3] the radiological signs of a slipped epiphysis namely enlarged joint space, displacement of the nidus, distancing of the metaphysis and metaphyseal bony fragmentations can be missing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%