2011
DOI: 10.1177/1367493511406569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth outcomes among booked and unbooked women at a secondary health facility in southwest Nigeria

Abstract: A case-controlled analytic study involving 406 singleton unbooked and 396 singleton booked births was conducted. Unbooked births constituted 16.6% of all births during the study. Booked births were half as likely to preterm than unbooked births (43, 10.9% vs 81, 20.0%; p<0.001). Unbooked births were seven times more likely to be stillbirth than booked births (80, 17.7% vs 13, 3.3%; p< 0.001). Booked births were a third as likely to have a low birth weight as unbooked births (36, 9.1% vs 104, 25.6%; p< 0.001). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By not attending ANC, it is not possible to identify women who have high-risk pregnancies and refer them for closer monitoring during childbirth, or for an elective Caesarean section at a secondary or tertiary centre [24]. Thus, not surprisingly, not attending antenatal care was associated with a considerably higher risk for preterm delivery and stillbirths in this population, consistent with previous reports [4, 25–28]. Similarly, the high levels of maternal mortality in women not attending ANC in the country can likely be ascribed to the women not having attended the appropriate level of care during pregnancy and childbirth, and not having received interventions during pregnancy such antiretroviral treatment [13, 14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By not attending ANC, it is not possible to identify women who have high-risk pregnancies and refer them for closer monitoring during childbirth, or for an elective Caesarean section at a secondary or tertiary centre [24]. Thus, not surprisingly, not attending antenatal care was associated with a considerably higher risk for preterm delivery and stillbirths in this population, consistent with previous reports [4, 25–28]. Similarly, the high levels of maternal mortality in women not attending ANC in the country can likely be ascribed to the women not having attended the appropriate level of care during pregnancy and childbirth, and not having received interventions during pregnancy such antiretroviral treatment [13, 14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Rates of ANC attendance, however, remain suboptimal in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [4, 5]. Within the southern and eastern regions of Africa, coverage ranges from 60% in Lesotho to 95% in Rwanda, with most countries around the 80% mark [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the mother, the perinatal health is also hampered by the absence of antenatal visits.Unbooked cases were also more prone to have preterm delivery (14.7% vs 39%) and deliver low birth weight babies (24.5% vs 9.8%). Similar 3 findings were noted in the studies by Owolabiet al and 13 Osungbade et al Increased incidence of anemia in unbooked pa ents could also be a risk factor for preterm 11 delivery as noted in study done by Tucker et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The findings of adverse perinatal outcomes among women referred from peripheral healthcare facilities may be a reflection of the quality of EMOC available in those centers. Missed opportunities for early detection and prompt management of fetal and maternal conditions that adversely compromise fetal survival are responsible for unfavorable birth outcomes among women without prenatal care [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%