2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14325-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth registration coverage according to the sex of the head of household: an analysis of national surveys from 93 low- and middle-income countries

Abstract: Background Within-country inequalities in birth registration coverage (BRC) have been documented according to wealth, place of residence and other household characteristics. We investigated whether sex of the head of household was associated with BRC. Methods Using data from nationally-representative surveys (Demographic and Health Survey or Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey) from 93 low and middle-income countries (LMICs) carried out in 2010 or la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the study revealed that children born into female-headed households were less likely to be registered. Our result is in contrast to an earlier study, involving 93 countries in low-and middle-income countries that found the sex of household heads as not being consistently associated with the birth registration of children ( 22 ). We posit that the observed association could be due to several reasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the study revealed that children born into female-headed households were less likely to be registered. Our result is in contrast to an earlier study, involving 93 countries in low-and middle-income countries that found the sex of household heads as not being consistently associated with the birth registration of children ( 22 ). We posit that the observed association could be due to several reasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In many LMIC settings, men are considered the primary household earners and decision-makers [ 34 , 74 , 75 ]. Actively involving male partners and providing them with sufficient information can increase awareness of pregnancy-related threats and provision of financial or psychological support, which would consequently result in increased healthcare service uptake among pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many LMIC settings, men are considered the primary household earners and decision-makers [34,74,75]. Actively involving male partners and providing them with su cient information can increase awareness of pregnancy-related threats and provision of nancial or psychological support, which would consequently result in increased healthcare service uptake among pregnant women.…”
Section: Male Partner Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%