2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24634-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth size and gestational age in opposite-sex twins as compared to same-sex twins: An individual-based pooled analysis of 21 cohorts

Abstract: It is well established that boys are born heavier and longer than girls, but it remains unclear whether birth size in twins is affected by the sex of their co-twin. We conducted an individual-based pooled analysis of 21 twin cohorts in 15 countries derived from the COllaborative project of Development of Anthropometrical measures in Twins (CODATwins), including 67,850 dizygotic twin individuals. Linear regression analyses showed that boys having a co-twin sister were, on average, 31 g (95% CI 18 to 45) heavier… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
15
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that females from opposite-sex twin pairs did not differ in terms of reproductive outcomes from females from same-sex twins, rather, they had the same chances of getting pregnant and having children compared to women with a female co-twin. In accordance with other studies, baseline characteristics such as birthweight of female twins and their adult BMI were not different between opposite-sex and same-sex twin pairs ( Bogl et al , 2017 ; Jelenkovic et al , 2018 ). Overall, our findings agree with what Medland et al (2008) reported in a study using three cohorts (Australia, The Netherlands and USA) and evaluating a total of 1979 females from same-sex twin pairs and 913 females from opposite-sex twin pairs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We found that females from opposite-sex twin pairs did not differ in terms of reproductive outcomes from females from same-sex twins, rather, they had the same chances of getting pregnant and having children compared to women with a female co-twin. In accordance with other studies, baseline characteristics such as birthweight of female twins and their adult BMI were not different between opposite-sex and same-sex twin pairs ( Bogl et al , 2017 ; Jelenkovic et al , 2018 ). Overall, our findings agree with what Medland et al (2008) reported in a study using three cohorts (Australia, The Netherlands and USA) and evaluating a total of 1979 females from same-sex twin pairs and 913 females from opposite-sex twin pairs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, our data did not support these effects for anthropometric traits. When we studied the sex of the co-twin, we found that boys having a female co-twin had a slightly greater birthweight and longer gestational age than DZ boys having a same-sex co-twin; in girls, no differences were seen between opposite-sex and same-sex DZ twins (Jelenkovic et al, 2018b). In adulthood, both men and women having an opposite-sex co-twin were slightly taller than those DZ twins having a same-sex co-twin, whereas BMI showed no differences between these twin-type groups (Bogl et al, 2017).…”
Section: Current Status Of the Databasementioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, if the correlation in opposite-sex DZ twin pairs is significantly lower than that of the same-sex pairs, the same genes do not contribute to the trait in males and females 5. Data from opposite sex twin pairs have been used as evidence for within utero "testosterone transfer" 334297 for some phenotypes such as epilepsy98 and language impairment 99. However, meta analyses of phenotypes such as body mass index and height have not supported the impact of prenatal hormone exposure on these phenotypes in later life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%