1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-8227(94)90110-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth size and risk of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An investigator from each of the 34 studies was invited to provide raw data (or estimates from pre-specified analyses), but one author [40] could not be contacted. Individual patient data or pre-specified estimates were obtained from 29 studies (in one study [28], data were extracted directly from the published report). Characteristics of these predominantly European studies are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An investigator from each of the 34 studies was invited to provide raw data (or estimates from pre-specified analyses), but one author [40] could not be contacted. Individual patient data or pre-specified estimates were obtained from 29 studies (in one study [28], data were extracted directly from the published report). Characteristics of these predominantly European studies are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also included 12,058 cases, thus providing high power to [10,28] c Adjusted for maternal age in categories as above, gestational age in categories (as above), birth order in categories (as above), maternal diabetes (see Table 1), Caesarean section (yes or no) and breastfeeding (see Table 1 for details) d Excluding case-control studies with controls not randomly selected or population-based or studies in which the response rate in either the case group or control group was less than 80% (or unknown) as shown in Table 1 Ref cat., reference category identify associations of relatively small magnitude and allowing reliable subgroup analyses. Although data were not available from five of the 34 studies identified, in the largest of these [30], approximate results could be extracted from a figure and were consistent with our main finding (as demonstrated by sensitivity analysis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a large European case-control study demonstrated a threefold reduction in diabetes risk among low-birthweight infants [3]. Other epidemiological studies, however, have failed to demonstrate a clear association between birthweight and type 1 diabetes risk [37,38] or have only found a link between birthweight and diabetes before age 10 years [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case-control studies investigating risks for childhood IDDM associated with in utero exposures have been conducted using reported information from mothers [14,16,19] or national datasets of variables routinely collected for descriptive statistics [13,15,29]. We report the results of the first large scale populationbased case-control study analysing detailed data directly abstracted from hospital medical records, permitting investigation of an extensive range of variables not available from birth statistics [13,15,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other maternal factors such as maternal-child blood group incompatibility [13], older age of mothers [13][14][15][16][17], toxaemia [13], maternal diabetes [13,15] and mother's educational attainment [14,15,18] appear to influence risk. Caesarean delivery [13,15], birthweight [19,20] and birth order [15,16] have also been implicated, although the mechanisms are unclear. These factors were considered as a priori hypotheses alongside additional new variables being examined for evidence of association.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%