2018
DOI: 10.1002/uog.19025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth‐weight differences at term are explained by placental dysfunction and not by maternal ethnicity

Abstract: Fetal BW variation at term is less dependent on ethnic origin and better explained by placental dysfunction. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we earlier suggested, the existence of low CPR values, would reflect a higher degree of growth restriction, regardless of BW centile ( Morales-Roselló et al., 2014 ; Morales-Roselló and Khalil, 2015 ). This was earlier observed in fetuses born in the Indian subcontinent ( Morales-Roselló et al., 2018 ), but this trend to growth restriction might be also carried by emigrants to the new place of residence ( Morales-Roselló et al., 2022 ) and according to our results would be only modified by the maternal BMI. This is also in line with investigations in emigrants suggesting that most of the BW variation is produced at the maternal and fetal level and very few (3%) at the place of residence level ( Mulinari et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As we earlier suggested, the existence of low CPR values, would reflect a higher degree of growth restriction, regardless of BW centile ( Morales-Roselló et al., 2014 ; Morales-Roselló and Khalil, 2015 ). This was earlier observed in fetuses born in the Indian subcontinent ( Morales-Roselló et al., 2018 ), but this trend to growth restriction might be also carried by emigrants to the new place of residence ( Morales-Roselló et al., 2022 ) and according to our results would be only modified by the maternal BMI. This is also in line with investigations in emigrants suggesting that most of the BW variation is produced at the maternal and fetal level and very few (3%) at the place of residence level ( Mulinari et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Placental hypoplasia, indicated by low placental weight, has been associated with maternal cardiovascular disease, vasculitis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, accelerated placental maturation, many of the major autosomal disorders, babies with trisomy, and major fetal malformations. 10,11,18,[21][22][23][24] Even though placental weight is an indicator of placental growth, it does not indicate the efficiency of the placental function. Most pathologists opine that the function and efficiency of the placenta are more important for fetal growth than measurements of weight alone: it indirectly depends on maternal well-being, including the nutritional state measured by maternal BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placental hypoplasia, indicated by low placental weight, has been associated with maternal cardiovascular disease, vasculitis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, accelerated placental maturation, many of the major autosomal disorders, babies with trisomy, and major fetal malformations. 10 , 11 , 18 , 21 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, customization 'normalises' smaller fetuses in Asian and Afro-Caribbean women, when women from these ethnicities are also at increased risk of stillbirth [34]. Similarly, other variable used in customised fetal growth charts such as maternal age, weight and parity have also been shown to be related to risk of stillbirth [35,36]. Apart from the concern that customisation of fetal growth is 'normalising' for variables that predispose to pregnancy pathology, there is also the question of biological rationale for customisation.…”
Section: Customized Chartsmentioning
confidence: 99%