2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2053-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth weight differences between those offered financial voucher incentives for verified smoking cessation and control participants enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), employing an intuitive approach and a Complier Average Causal Effects (CACE) analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), which offered financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in cessation. However, infant birth weight was not seen to be affected. This study re-examines birth weight using an intuitive and a complier average causal effects (CACE) method to uncover important information missed by intention-to-treat analysis.MethodsCPIT offered financial incentives up to £400 to pregnant smo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomized studies have shown that cooperation and to improve results so far, the only intervention, the financial incentive ["cash incentive"] proved to be the most effective in case of pregnant women in under developed areas [23]. Recently the CPIT trial proved that with offered financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in cessation among pregnant women [24]. We are aware of the fact that, after cessation of smoking perinatal outcomes have shown slight improvement [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized studies have shown that cooperation and to improve results so far, the only intervention, the financial incentive ["cash incentive"] proved to be the most effective in case of pregnant women in under developed areas [23]. Recently the CPIT trial proved that with offered financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in cessation among pregnant women [24]. We are aware of the fact that, after cessation of smoking perinatal outcomes have shown slight improvement [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intention-to-treat estimate will be severely diluted due to low smoking cessation rates and the 'per protocol' analysis will be biased by confounding. Consequently, we will also utilise an instrumental variable approach-complier average causal effect analysiswhich will estimate the true impact of incentive-induced smoking cessation on birth weight [35].…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intention to treat estimate will be severely diluted due to low smoking cessation rates and the 'per protocol' analysis will be biased by confounding. Consequently we will also utilise an instrumental variable approach-Complier Average Causal Effect analysis-which will estimate the true impact of incentive inducted smoking cessation on birth weight [35].…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%