2019
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Introduction The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the association between birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies. Material and methods MEDLINE, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched. Studies reporting the occurrence of morbidity in twins affected compared with those not affected by birthweight discordance were included. The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity (including neurological, respiratory, infectious morbidities, abnormal acid‐base status and nec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
35
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a large birthweight discordance between twins is strongly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes 4 and obstetricians tend to evaluate the degree of inter‐twin growth discordance by size on ultrasound examination in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the predictability of ultrasound examination parameters may be influenced by many factors, particularly the GA, and this should be acknowledged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a large birthweight discordance between twins is strongly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes 4 and obstetricians tend to evaluate the degree of inter‐twin growth discordance by size on ultrasound examination in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the predictability of ultrasound examination parameters may be influenced by many factors, particularly the GA, and this should be acknowledged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies are at increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with dichorionic (DC) gestations, mostly owing to conditions arising from their placental vascular arrangement, such as twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), twin anemia-polycythemia sequence and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main rationale for using discordant growth in dichorionic twins as a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes, that in turn justifies closer antenatal surveillance and iatrogenic preterm delivery, is that it might indicate growth restriction of the smaller twin, with the larger twin serving as a naturally occurring control. However to date, data on the optimal cutoff that should be used to define discordant growth in twins have been conflicting [18] with recommendations currently ranging from 15 to 30% [15][16][17]32]. One potential explanation for this controversy is the fact that many studies failed to account for important confounding factors such as chorionicity, complications related to monochorionic twins such as twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, structural or genetic anomalies of the smaller twin, and SGA of the smaller twin [9,15,16,18].…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Results In The Context Of Previous Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%