1978
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740878006494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium μ-hydrido-pentadecacarbonylpentaosmate, [(Ph3P)2N]+[HOs5(CO)15]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0.06 A longer than the other two equatorial bonds in the structure, and slightly longer than the value of 2.867(2) A for the hydride-bridged bond in the cluster anion [Os,H(CO),,] -. 17 In terms of electron counting Os(4) is formally electron poor, with 17 electrons, while either Os(2) or Os(3) may be considered as electron rich, depending on the direction of donation of the bridging hydride ligand. This electronic imbalance is partially redressed by two incipient bridging carbonyl ligands, C( 12)0( 12) and C(2 1)0(2 l), donating electron density to the electron-poor Os(4) atom [Os(4)-€(12) 12), bridges the shortest 0s-0s bond in the structure.…”
Section: (10)-(12)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.06 A longer than the other two equatorial bonds in the structure, and slightly longer than the value of 2.867(2) A for the hydride-bridged bond in the cluster anion [Os,H(CO),,] -. 17 In terms of electron counting Os(4) is formally electron poor, with 17 electrons, while either Os(2) or Os(3) may be considered as electron rich, depending on the direction of donation of the bridging hydride ligand. This electronic imbalance is partially redressed by two incipient bridging carbonyl ligands, C( 12)0( 12) and C(2 1)0(2 l), donating electron density to the electron-poor Os(4) atom [Os(4)-€(12) 12), bridges the shortest 0s-0s bond in the structure.…”
Section: (10)-(12)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the equatorial Ir(3) atom is connected to two bridging groups, Ir( 1) and Ir(2) to one only: therefore, in the equatorial triangle, the system of three mutually adjacent bridging carbonyl groups, which appears almost constant in trigonal bipyramidal carbonyl clusters,10-12"4 is not present. Two bridging carbonyls, CD( 14) and CD(25), can be considered symmetric, whereas the two p-CO ligands bonded to Ir(3), CD(34) and CD(35), are clearly asymmetric, with the shorter length being toward the Fe (mean Ir-C 2.225, Fe-C 1.865 A).The metal-metal distances can be divided in three sets: Ir-Ir (mean 2.708), bridged Ir-Fe (mean 2.61 8), and unbridged Ir-Fe (2.702 A). Therefore, in this monoanion, the bridging C O ligands significantly shorten the corresponding M-M bonds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contradictory results have been found from the different 72e – TBPs considered in this paper. While PSEPT appropriately accounts for six M–M bonding electron pairs in 1 – 4 , other TEC = 72 clusters are proved to feature nine M–M bonds in agreement with EAN rule (e.g., Os 5 clusters , ). The MO analysis points out that a basic difference between the two cases is the actual degree of involvement of d orbitals in skeletal bonding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…An example is the hypothetical species [Os 5 (CO) 15 ] 2– (experimentally unknown but optimized by DFT calculations), which consists of five L 3 M-d 8 fragments with one additional electron pair introduced by the doubly negative charge. The experimentally isolated isoelectronic [Os 5 (CO) 14 (PR 3 )­(μ-H)] − and Os 5 (CO) 15 (μ-H) 2 may be formally seen as the result of protonating one or two Os–Os bonds, without changing the number of electrons, or alternatively two edge-bridging hydrides supply the electrons similarly to the Sn­(II) lone pairs in 1 – 4 . At variance with the latter, H 1s orbitals are contracted and hardly withstand with a M 3 capping position, an exception being found in [Pt 3 (dppm) 3 (μ 3 -H)] + .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%