2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BisGMA/TEGDMA ratio and filler content effects on shrinkage stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
97
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore it can be seen that the two materials (SDR and Venus) with the fastest polymerization rates (highest slopes) also had the largest total volumetric shrinkage. Our shrinkage value obtained for Z250 (1.13%) corresponds well with other published values of ~1.1% [21,33,[36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore it can be seen that the two materials (SDR and Venus) with the fastest polymerization rates (highest slopes) also had the largest total volumetric shrinkage. Our shrinkage value obtained for Z250 (1.13%) corresponds well with other published values of ~1.1% [21,33,[36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The degree of conversion is influenced by Bis-GMA content and co-monomer types with TEGDMA mixtures resulting in higher conversion than BisEMA (Ethoxylated Bisphenol-A Dimethacrylate) blends 19) . For Bis-GMA/TEGDMA formulations, the resin matrix has a greater influence on polymerization stress, reaction rate and degree of conversion, whereas filler fraction showed a stronger influence on shrinkage and modulus 20) . The resin matrix of the giomer restoratives were all based on Bis-GMA/TEGDMA mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal cycling probably affected the water sorption in the two composites. Several studies have shown that all components of resin composites affect the water sorption 24,[29][30][31] , with the polymer playing the main role because of the type of monomer, polar interaction, and degree of conversion 24) . The percentage of gaps in the Siloranes sample did not increase significantly after cycling but in the Methacrylates this difference was significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of gaps in the Siloranes sample did not increase significantly after cycling but in the Methacrylates this difference was significant. Methacrylates composite contains a rich TEGDMA matrix that has shown high shrinkage causing a closer packing of the polymer chains due to the antiplasticizing effect 28,29) . In addition, silorane-based polymers have demonstrated lower magnitudes of water sorption, solubility, and hygroscopic expansion than methacrylatebased resin composites 24,30,31) , thereby reducing the elution of unpolymerized monomers that could contribute to delaying the initial marginal gap formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%