2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39467-6_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisimulation Reduction of Big Graphs on MapReduce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Independently and parallel to our work, [18] have proposed a MapReduce-based implementation of bisimulation. While they seem to be mostly interested in a clever handling of skew data, we aim at reducing the overall number of MapReduce tasks required for computing a bisimulation reduction, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Independently and parallel to our work, [18] have proposed a MapReduce-based implementation of bisimulation. While they seem to be mostly interested in a clever handling of skew data, we aim at reducing the overall number of MapReduce tasks required for computing a bisimulation reduction, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give a rough comparison of the evaluation results of the different implementations, we first have to comment on the Hadoop clusters used. While our cluster consists of 10 nodes each having a 1.9 GHz 6-Core CPU with 32 GB RAM, the cluster described in [18] has a size of 72 nodes each being equipped with a 2.0 GHz 8-Core CPU with 64 GB RAM. Our DBPedia dataset consists of 61.06M nodes and 198.09M triples, while theirs consists of only of 38.62M nodes and 115.3M triples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to our knowledge there is no known effective solution for computing bisimulation and k-bisimulation partitions on arbitrary graph structures in external memory. Such an algorithm would not only enable us to process big graphs on single machines, but also provide an essential step for parallel and distributed solutions (e.g., MapReduce [20]) to further scale their performance on real graphs. As noted in paper [20] and many other researches (e.g., [19]), in many cases, single machine external memory algorithms are more competitive than distributed algorithms due to their lack of communication overhead and their effective use of available infrastructure.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms targeting various constraints and computational models, such as main-memory algorithms [1], I/O efficient algorithms [16,22] and distributed solutions [6,21], have been developed to efficiently compute bisimulation partitions of massive graphs. For example, the state-of-the-art MapReduce-based algorithm [21] can compute a "k-localized" variant of bisimulation, discussed below, on a social graph with 1.4 billion edges in a few hours, for k = 10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%