2009
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.20.4057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisphosphonates and Bone Turnover in Premenopausal Women Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the median PFS for capecitabine (9.2 months) was better than the PFS seen in previous studies (4.1 to 7.7 months) [1-5]. The median PFS for taxanes (7.8 months) was in keeping with previous studies (3.6–12.9 months) [5, 914]. Similarly, the median PFS for anthracyclines (8 months) was in keeping with previous studies (3.1–11 months) [510].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the median PFS for capecitabine (9.2 months) was better than the PFS seen in previous studies (4.1 to 7.7 months) [1-5]. The median PFS for taxanes (7.8 months) was in keeping with previous studies (3.6–12.9 months) [5, 914]. Similarly, the median PFS for anthracyclines (8 months) was in keeping with previous studies (3.1–11 months) [510].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The median PFS for all groups was generally better than those seen in previous studies [114]. In this study, the median PFS for capecitabine (9.2 months) was better than the PFS seen in previous studies (4.1 to 7.7 months) [1-5]. The median PFS for taxanes (7.8 months) was in keeping with previous studies (3.6–12.9 months) [5, 914].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The available antiresorptive therapies using bisphosphonates are known to reduce resorption and increase bone mass and thus have some efficacy in preventing/reducing osteoporosis (17). A review (34) has indicated that there have been attempts at using bisphosphonates to ameliorate the possible side effects of cancer-induced or treatment-induced bone loss. However, one study has shown that there were no significant changes in terms of bone loss between the treatment groups receiving oral risedronate or placebo, which has called into question the correct dosing of bisphosphonates (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one study has shown that there were no significant changes in terms of bone loss between the treatment groups receiving oral risedronate or placebo, which has called into question the correct dosing of bisphosphonates (16). The review (34) has also mentioned that bisphosphonates inhibit the formation of new bone as well as bone resorption and that the increase in bone density seen in some studies involving the use of bisphosphonates might be due to the increased mineralization of the old bone and inhibition of the new soft bone. However, high costs involved in their administration and occasional toxicities and side effects, including brittle bones due to suppressed bone turnover, have limited their widespread usage, and the cost-effectiveness of their usage or long-term use has been questioned (9,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RIBBON-1 trial proved that bevacizumab increased PFS and overall response rate when compared to placebo when this agent was used with single agent taxanes, anthracycline-based regimes, and capecitabine [102]. A subset analysis of patients with TNBC demonstrated an improvement in PFS when bevacizumab was used both with capecitabine (6.1 vs. 4.2 months, HR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.49-1.06).…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%