2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701382114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisulfite-converted duplexes for the strand-specific detection and quantification of rare mutations

Abstract: The identification of mutations that are present at low frequencies in clinical samples is an essential component of precision medicine. The development of molecular barcoding for next-generation sequencing has greatly enhanced the sensitivity of detecting such mutations by massively parallel sequencing. However, further improvements in specificity would be useful for a variety of applications. We herein describe a technology (BiSeqS) that can increase the specificity of sequencing by at least two orders of ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, assymetric chemical labelling of the adapter strands in a way that they can be physically separated can serve an SDE role. A recently described variation of Duplex Sequencing uses bisulfite conversion to transform naturally occurring strand asymmetries in the form of cytosine methylation into sequence differences that distinguish the two strands 86,87 . Although this implementation limits the types of mutations that can be detected, the concept of capitalizing on native asymmetry is noteworthy in the context of emerging sequencing technologies that can directly detect modified nucleotides 88 .…”
Section: Molecular Consensus Sequencing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, assymetric chemical labelling of the adapter strands in a way that they can be physically separated can serve an SDE role. A recently described variation of Duplex Sequencing uses bisulfite conversion to transform naturally occurring strand asymmetries in the form of cytosine methylation into sequence differences that distinguish the two strands 86,87 . Although this implementation limits the types of mutations that can be detected, the concept of capitalizing on native asymmetry is noteworthy in the context of emerging sequencing technologies that can directly detect modified nucleotides 88 .…”
Section: Molecular Consensus Sequencing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin to address this vexing issue, recently investigators have explored the use of epigenetic DNA modifications and physical DNA fragmentation patterns to identify not only ctDNA, but which tissue of origin the ctDNA was derived from ( 103 , 104 ). Bisulfite treatment followed by NGS is typically how one can distinguish methylated from unmethylated DNA ( 105 ), but newer approaches using immunoprecipitation have also been published and show high sensitivity and specificity for a given tumor type ( 106 ). These promising approaches set the stage for future clinical utility studies that may realize the full potential of ctDNA and liquid biopsies.…”
Section: Clinical Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other double-stranded methods include PacBio SMRTbells [35], in which both strands of a DNA fragment are integrated into a circular single-stranded molecule. Also, BiSeqS [42] and muSeq [43] use partial bisulfite treatments to convert a random subset of Cs to Ts to differentiate sense and antisense strands (note that additional information from UMIs or endogenous barcodes would be needed to trace individual reads back to both strands from the same original DNA fragment, which has not yet been implemented in BiSeqS). One limitation of these related approaches is that the C-to-T changes introduced by bisulfite treatment raise obvious challenges for quantifying real C-to-T changes.…”
Section: Differentiating Features Of High-fidelity Sequencing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%