2009
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2009.2015873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bite Weight Prediction From Acoustic Recognition of Chewing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the greater the number of foods, the more complicated the signal processing scheme becomes and the less accurate the system is. For example, Amft et al [77] are able to classify between three types of food with 94% accuracy. However, Amft [49], categorizing between four types of food, obtained an accuracy of only 86.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the greater the number of foods, the more complicated the signal processing scheme becomes and the less accurate the system is. For example, Amft et al [77] are able to classify between three types of food with 94% accuracy. However, Amft [49], categorizing between four types of food, obtained an accuracy of only 86.6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amft [49] specified their vibration-based detecting system using a condenser microphone embedded in an ear pad for food classification, which is demonstrated in Figure 4a. Amft et al [77] further expanded the food classification to chewing and bite weight recognition. The chewing recognition procedure employs the chewing sequences, waveforms of sounds indicating chewing captured by ear pad sensors.…”
Section: Acoustic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The vibration of broken foods is conducted through mandible and skull to the ear canal. Scenario and analysis using a static spotting algorithm had been previously reported for this dataset in [23]. Here the dataset properties are briefly summarised.…”
Section: ) Dataset 2: Spotting Chewing Strokesmentioning
confidence: 99%