1997
DOI: 10.2172/431140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black box multigrid solver for definite and indefinite problems

Abstract: DISCLAIMERThis report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, For any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any leg& Eability or respomibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disdased, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, when multi-level implementations are considered this pattern may be resolved recursively by a similar approach, using some splitting of the next fine grid fc c c derived from c the same way f was derived from c U f . A reasonable choice is to use the above splitting method also for fc; it is recommended to construct the next prolongation and restriction operators Pc : c + c and R, : c + c not from JcRAPJ: but from a modification of it, in which elements which are outside the pattern of the corresponding linear finite element scheme are 'thrown' to the main diagonal (see [9] [lo]). With this implementation, the pattern of the coarse grid coefficient matrix is preserved also for the next coarse level coefficient matrix, which results in an efficient multi-level implementation.…”
Section: A Two-step Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, when multi-level implementations are considered this pattern may be resolved recursively by a similar approach, using some splitting of the next fine grid fc c c derived from c the same way f was derived from c U f . A reasonable choice is to use the above splitting method also for fc; it is recommended to construct the next prolongation and restriction operators Pc : c + c and R, : c + c not from JcRAPJ: but from a modification of it, in which elements which are outside the pattern of the corresponding linear finite element scheme are 'thrown' to the main diagonal (see [9] [lo]). With this implementation, the pattern of the coarse grid coefficient matrix is preserved also for the next coarse level coefficient matrix, which results in an efficient multi-level implementation.…”
Section: A Two-step Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%