2011 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/rose.2011.6058544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black-box optimization of sensor placement with elevation maps and probabilistic sensing models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to tackle these problems, we develop a novel probabilistic coverage function for sensor placement that takes into account the above mentioned issues, and then compare this approach with some classical optimization algorithms. This paper extends our previous work [2,3] by proposing directional and probabilistic sensor models along the pan and tilt sensing angles, and comparing the optimization with other methods, that is simulated annealing and L-BFGS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In order to tackle these problems, we develop a novel probabilistic coverage function for sensor placement that takes into account the above mentioned issues, and then compare this approach with some classical optimization algorithms. This paper extends our previous work [2,3] by proposing directional and probabilistic sensor models along the pan and tilt sensing angles, and comparing the optimization with other methods, that is simulated annealing and L-BFGS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The sensing range of s j is a reference distance r s from which we can pronounce on the coverage of p i by s j in function of their distance d(p i , s j ) [5], [6], [7], [8]. The influence of this factor on C(p i , s j ), modeled by the function [9], [10], [7], where C(p i , s j ) degrades with respect to d(p i , s j ), and it becomes null when the point p i is outside the sensing range of s j ; (iii) Hybrid impact [11], [12], [13], by considering that s j has two sensing ranges, the first is "with certitude", noted r 1 , and the second is "without certitude", noted r 2 , where r 2 > r 1 . Thus, C(p i , s j ) is constant with respect to d(p i , s j ), as long as p i is in the sensing range "with certitude" of s j ; it is null when p i is outside the sensing range "without certitude" of s j , and it degrades with [14], [6], [15], which means that…”
Section: A Impact Of the Sns Sensing Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…as long as p i is in the sensing angle of s j . Otherwise, C(p i , s j ) is null; (ii) Probabilistic impact [9], [10], which means that…”
Section: A Impact Of the Sns Sensing Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the Mahalanobis distance metric with CMA-ES in SCMA-ES algorithm , better niching behavior was observed by Shir et al [13] on multimodal landscapes, The algorithm depends on spatial classification based on ellipsoids rather than Euclidean hyperspheres. In real-life application problems like digital filter design [14] wireless sensor networks [15],design of plannar antenna arrays [16], image reconstruction [17],CMA-ES has found wide applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%