2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2010.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black box scatter search for general classes of binary optimization problems

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to apply the scatter search methodology to general classes of binary problems. We focus on optimization problems for which the solutions are represented as binary vectors and that may or may not include constraints. Binary problems arise in a variety of settings, including engineering design and statistical mechanics (e.g., the spin glass problem). A distinction is made between two sets of general constraint types that are handled directly by the solver and other constraints that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational tests showed that their procedure outperformed the general-purpose optimizers that are not specialized to only tackle permutation problems. Similar results were obtained in (Gortázar, Duarte, Laguna, & Martí, 2010) for problems with binary variables. Some solution methodologies have been designed with the black-box framework in mind, as in the case of random-key genetic algorithms (RKGA).…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Representation Of the Black-box Optimizasupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computational tests showed that their procedure outperformed the general-purpose optimizers that are not specialized to only tackle permutation problems. Similar results were obtained in (Gortázar, Duarte, Laguna, & Martí, 2010) for problems with binary variables. Some solution methodologies have been designed with the black-box framework in mind, as in the case of random-key genetic algorithms (RKGA).…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Representation Of the Black-box Optimizasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It is not expected for blackbox methods to perform better than the state-of-the-art in any particular problem instance; however, the comparison is helpful in assessing the size of the gap between a general and a specialized procedure in each problem class. This work may be viewed as the fourth in a series of general-purpose solvers created for problems with specific types of variables: continuous variables , permutation variables (Campos, Laguna, & Martí, 2005) and binary variables (Gortázar, Duarte, Laguna, & Martí, 2010). Specifically, our interest is to develop a solver for an evaluation black box that takes as input a vector of integers.…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Representation Of the Black-box Optimizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three more recent examples of B&B algorithms are provided in Aringhieri, Bruglieri, & Cordone (2009) ;Martí, Gallego, & Duarte (2010) and Sørensen (2004) which can solve problems with up to 150 vertices. On the other hand, there are many heuristics devoted to the MEWCP: Tabu search (Aringhieri & Cordone, 2011;Macambira, 2003), iterated tabu search (Palubeckis, 2007), iterated greedy algorithm (Lozano, Molina, & García-Martínez, 2011), greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (Andrade, de Andrade, Martins, & Plastino, 2005;Silva, De Andrade, Ochi, Martins, & Plastino, 2007), genetic algorithm (Feng, Jiang, Fan, & Fu, 2010), variable neighborhood search (Brimberg, Mladenović, Urošević, & Ngai, 2009), scatter search (Gallego, Duarte, Laguna, & Martí, 2009;Gortázar, Duarte, Laguna, & Martí, 2010), path-relinking method (Andrade, de Andrade, Martins, & Plastino, 2005) and memetic search (Wang, Hao, Glover, & Lü, 2014;Wu & Hao, 2013). Comprehensive surveys and comparisons of the most significant heuristic and metaheuristic methods for the MEWCP before 2011 can be found in Cordone (2011) andPardo (2013).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed in the 1970s, recent applications of SS show its effectiveness to solve nonlinear optimization problems [32], and in optimization problems where the evaluation of the objective function implies costly computations (e.g., black-box optimization [33] and simulation optimization [34]). This advantage makes SS a good candidate for the solution of the bilevel optimization problem in models (1)- (20) since every feasible solution of (1)-(7) requires the solution of an optimal dispatch to find the reaction of the DisCo (problems (8)- (20)).…”
Section: Solution Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%