2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014jd022350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black carbon and other light‐absorbing particles in snow of central North America

Abstract: Vertical profiles of light-absorbing particles in seasonal snow were sampled from 67 North American sites. Over 500 snow samples and 55 soil samples from these sites were optically analyzed for spectrally resolved visible light absorption. The optical measurements were used to estimate black carbon (BC) mixing ratios in snow (C est BC ), contributions to absorption by BC and non-BC particles, and the absorption Ångström exponent of particles in snow and local soil. Sites in Canada tended to have the lowest BC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
183
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
183
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Doherty et al (2016) also calibrated the ISSW measurements using an incandescence technique (a singleparticle soot photometer, SP2) in a subset of the observations, which was intended to capture C BC more accurately, and derived a ratio of C BC by ISSW to C BC by SP2 based on their linear relationship for the estimation of real C BC . This calibration is applied to the dataset of Doherty et al (2014) in our study, and thus the observations of Doherty et al (2014Doherty et al ( , 2016 used here are comparable. In addition, Skiles and Painter (2016b) made daily measurements of BC-in-snow with an SP2 in the Senator Beck Basin Study Area (SBBSA) in the San Juan Mountains during a period of 2 months (late March to middle May) in 2013.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Doherty et al (2016) also calibrated the ISSW measurements using an incandescence technique (a singleparticle soot photometer, SP2) in a subset of the observations, which was intended to capture C BC more accurately, and derived a ratio of C BC by ISSW to C BC by SP2 based on their linear relationship for the estimation of real C BC . This calibration is applied to the dataset of Doherty et al (2014) in our study, and thus the observations of Doherty et al (2014Doherty et al ( , 2016 used here are comparable. In addition, Skiles and Painter (2016b) made daily measurements of BC-in-snow with an SP2 in the Senator Beck Basin Study Area (SBBSA) in the San Juan Mountains during a period of 2 months (late March to middle May) in 2013.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although field observations of C BC in snow extend back to the 1980s, they were made mostly in the polar regions, the Alps, the Cascade Mountains, eastern Canada, and western Texas and New Mexico (see Qian et al, 2015 and references therein). Recently, Doherty et al (2014) made valuable measurements of the vertical profiles of LAAs in seasonal snow from January to March 2013 in the western US. They used an integrating sphere-integrating sandwich (ISSW) spectrophotometer to estimate the C BC over 67 sites in North America (including 17 sites in the Rocky Mountain region).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This could be a serious disadvantage since paleoclimate data indicate significant increases in aeolian dust deposition during glacial times, especially along the southern margins of the NH ice sheets (Kohfeld and Harrison, 2001;Mahowald et al, 2006). Both theoretical analysis (Warren and Wiscombe, 1980;Aoki et al, 2011) and direct measurements (Painter et al, 2010Skiles et al, 2012;Bryant et al, 2013;Doherty et al, 2013Doherty et al, , 2014Gautam et al, 2013) demonstrate that even small amounts of impurities affect the surface albedo significantly. In turn, the results from the SEB simulations show that these changes in albedo might significantly affect the surface mass balance of ice sheets during glacial times (Krinner et al, 2006;Ganopolski et al, 2010) and in future climate change scenarios (Dumont et al, 2014;Goelles et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%