“…Based on the recent updates in current understanding of RF for BC on snow and sea ice (changes for 2010 relative to 1750) summarized in Bond et al [2013] (+0.046 W m À2 , selected from the range spanning +0.015 to +0.094 W m À2 ), the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013; Boucher et al, 2013] adopted the magnitude of the RF for BC on snow and sea ice of +0.04 W m À2 (from the uncertainty range spanning +0.02 to +0.09 W m À2 ) (further information regarding RF for the LAAs on snow and ice is available in a recent review paper by Qian et al [2015]). As summarized in Qian et al [2015], many modeling studies have mainly focused on BC SDE [e.g., Jacobson, 2004;Flanner et al, 2007;Koch et al, 2009a;Qian et al, 2009Qian et al, , 2014Menon et al, 2010;Skeie et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2013;Jiao et al, 2014], and measurements of BC (or elemental carbon) in snow (ice cores and/or snow samples) have been recently carried out in many regions [Xu et al, 2006[Xu et al, , 2009a[Xu et al, , 2009bMcConnell et al, 2007;Ming et al, 2008Ming et al, , 2009Ming et al, , 2012Ming et al, , 2013Forsström et al, 2009Forsström et al, , 2013Doherty et al, 2010Doherty et al, , 2013Doherty et al, , 2014bKaspari et al, 2011Kaspari et al, , 2014Kaspari et al, , 2015Ye et al, 2012;Jenkins et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2013;Ginot et al, 2014;Kuchiki et al, 2015;…”