2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.06655
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black hole - neutron star mergers: the first mass gap and kilonovae

Abstract: Observations of X-ray binaries indicate a dearth of compact objects in the mass range from ∼ 2 − 5 M and the existence of this (first mass) gap has been used to advance our understanding of the engines behind core-collapse supernovae. LIGO/Virgo observations provide an independent measure of binary compact remnant masses and several candidate first mass gap objects (either NS or BH) were observed in the O3 science run. We study the formation of BH-NS mergers in the framework of isolated classical binary evolut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
32
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
6
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the predicted brightness for most of kilonovae still be too faint for the follow-up observations of LSST. This result is basically consistent with other recent studies (e.g., Zappa et al 2019;Zhu et al 2020b;Drozda et al 2020). For future GW-triggered multi-messenger observations, one may search for potential sGRB and afterglow as ideal EM counterparts of NSBH GW events.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the predicted brightness for most of kilonovae still be too faint for the follow-up observations of LSST. This result is basically consistent with other recent studies (e.g., Zappa et al 2019;Zhu et al 2020b;Drozda et al 2020). For future GW-triggered multi-messenger observations, one may search for potential sGRB and afterglow as ideal EM counterparts of NSBH GW events.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The survey projects we consider in this work include the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF; Bellm et al 2019;Masci et al 2019), the Multichannel Photometric Survey Telescope 2 (Mephisto; Er et al 2021, in preparation), the Wide Field Survey Telescope (WFST;et al Kong et al 2021, in preparation), the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST; LSST Science Collaboration et al 2009), and the SiTian Projects (SiTian; Liu et al 2021). We note that NSBH mergers may have a lower event rate density, that NSBH kilonovae may be dimmer than BNS kilonovae (e.g., Zhu et al 2020) and that most NSBH mergers in the universe are likely plunging events (e.g., Abbott et al 2021a;Zappa et al 2019;Drozda et al 2020;Zhu et al 2021c;Broekgaarden et al 2021). As a result, the detection rates of kilonova and afterglow emissions from NSBH mergers should be much lower than those from BNS mergers (Zhu et al 2021f).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The most widely accepted formation channel for the majority of NSBH binaries in the universe is the classical Common Envelope (CE) scenario (e.g., Giacobbo & Mapelli 2018;Belczynski et al 2020;Drozda et al 2020;Shao & Li 2021;. In this scenario, the immediate progenitor of a NSBH binary just after the CE phase is a close binary system, which consists of a compact object (NS or BH) and a helium star.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%