Language in South Africa 2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511486692.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Black South African English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In presenting the findings of the data analysis which was undertaken in this study, we first deal with the results of the assessment of students' perceptions on black South African English which yielded was based on the following five major features (categories) identified as peculiar to BSAE (Gough, 1994;Buthelezi, 1995;McEwan, 1992;Moyo, 1994;De Klerk andGough, 2002 andMakalela, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In presenting the findings of the data analysis which was undertaken in this study, we first deal with the results of the assessment of students' perceptions on black South African English which yielded was based on the following five major features (categories) identified as peculiar to BSAE (Gough, 1994;Buthelezi, 1995;McEwan, 1992;Moyo, 1994;De Klerk andGough, 2002 andMakalela, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the teaching of English as a second language has been in the hands of non-native speakers of the language who have often been unqualified or under-qualified for the task (Buthelezi, 1995). This led to learners acquiring incorrect English language forms which got fossilised (De Klerk & Gough, 2002). Hence, both (Buthelezi, 1995;De Klerk & Gough, 2002) view the occurrence of nonstandard English features as teacher-induced.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Bsaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations