Blackberries, Tweets, and YouTube: Technology and the Future of Communicating with Congress

Abstract

From the establishment of the United States Postal Service and the invention of the telegram, to the introduction of C-SPAN and the explosion of the Internet, the development of new communication technologies has always affected the functioning of Congress. Not surprisingly, recent innovations such as e-mail and social networking have spurred Congress to alter the way it operates as an institution, and rethink the manner in which it engages the public. In this brief examination, I discuss recent changes in congressional behavior and practices due to technological innovation, specifically the proliferation of social networking Web sites. Then, I cautiously predict future trends in the use of social networking and related technologies as they become more integrated in congressional offices and increase the capacity for more robust internal and constituent communications over time.

Congressional twitter use revisited on the platform's 10‐year anniversary

“…Thus, when we set out to analyze tweets from 2017, we used the same codebook. Related work on analyzing legislative tweets has validated that earlier work; codebooks developed for other projects have been remarkably similar to the codes we used in the first study (e.g., Mergel, ; Shogan, ).…”

Information Materialities of Citizen Communication in the U.S. Congress

“…Within the congressional research community, there is a growing belief that this rise in communication channels will offer increasingly inexpensive and unmediated pathways for citizens to communicate policy preferences and express support or grievances with Members [16]. In return, direct access to citizen information and preferences is thought to provide more accountability and responsiveness to representatives [40,59]. This narrative supports the promise that communication technologies can transform democratic representation by giving more power to voices of citizens.…”

Political communication in Social Networks Election campaigns and Digital Data Analysis: A Bibliographic Review

“…Studies have then stabilized and centralized around a homogeneous group of scholars. & Lilleker, 2009;Jackson & Lilleker, 2011;Baxter & Marcella, 2012Broersma & Graham, 2012;Adi et al, 2014;Graham et al, 2014;Margaretten & Gaber, 2014;Engesser et al, 2016;Lilleker et al, 2016;Shephard & Quinlan, 2016;Ampofo et al, 2011;Kim & Yoo, 2012;Anstead & O'Loughlin, 2015;Di Fatta et al, 2015;Gaber, 2016;Jensen, 2016;USA Lassen & Brown, 2010;Shogan, 2010;Chi & Yang, 2011;Hong & Nadler, 2011Livne et al, 2011;Mascaro et al, 2012;Parmelee, Bichard, 2012;Peterson, 2012;Adams & McCorkindale, 2013;Caplan, 2013;Christensen, 2013;Conway et al, 2013Conway et al, , 2015Goodnow, 2013;Hanna et al, 2013;Hemphill et al, 2013;Hong, 2013;LaMarre & Suzuki-Lambrecht, 2013;Mirer & Bode, 2013;Settle et Shamma et al, 2009;Diakopoulos & Shamma, 2010;…”