2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.6126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blade Forced Response Prediction for Industrial Gas Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 14 displays the blade displacement predicted by the 156 aeroelastic ROM at the flutter condition, the third and first modes are the two most dominant ones while the second mode is nearly negligible. The dynamic pressure needed to induce flutter is q ∞ = 1.455x10 6 Pa, nearly 10 times larger than the baseline operating condition at q ∞ = 1.416x10 5 Pa. Hence the rotor made with the material spec- Table 1 is determined to be structurally stable under the chosen operating condition, with a high margin of safety, when only an isolated blade is considered, this finding consistent with that in [5,22].…”
Section: Flutter Analysis For Rotor 67supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 14 displays the blade displacement predicted by the 156 aeroelastic ROM at the flutter condition, the third and first modes are the two most dominant ones while the second mode is nearly negligible. The dynamic pressure needed to induce flutter is q ∞ = 1.455x10 6 Pa, nearly 10 times larger than the baseline operating condition at q ∞ = 1.416x10 5 Pa. Hence the rotor made with the material spec- Table 1 is determined to be structurally stable under the chosen operating condition, with a high margin of safety, when only an isolated blade is considered, this finding consistent with that in [5,22].…”
Section: Flutter Analysis For Rotor 67supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The resulting fluid-structure system is a time dependent set of equations describing not only the flow variables in the entire domain, but also the motion of the structure immersed in the fluid. The system can be solved either in the frequency [6] or time domain [5]. The frequency domain approach may be preferred for linear problems for its computational efficiency; however for a nonlinear problem, it is more efficient and accurate to arrive at solution with the time domain approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Described in detail by Moffatt and He (2003), and illustrated in Fig. 1, the decoupled method represents an openloop system, requiring only a single execution of the fluid and structural equations.…”
Section: Overview Of Decoupled Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear harmonic method has been used for decoupled forced response calculations by Moffatt and He (2003) to provide a frequency-domain approach capable of dealing with flow nonlinearities that is typically 30-100 times faster than equivalent multi-passage time-marching calculations (Ning et al, 2003a,b;Chen et al, 2001). Whilst this decoupled method is a linearized approach, it is not restricted to linear flow conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the blades are subjected to periodic aerodynamic excitation in resonant conditions. The approach proposed in this Note is to design how to avoid dangerous resonances in the operating range [1]. This is a qualitative standard design practice to avoid resonance using the Campbell diagram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%