Blanket Consent and Trust in the Biobanking Context

Nielsen, Morten Ebbe Juul; Kongsholm, Nana Cecilie Halmsted

doi:10.1007/s11673-022-10208-5

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They point out the importance of considering this in informed consent processes where porcine derived products may be needed. Nielsen and Kongsholm (2022) present the case for a trust-based consent process for future potential uses of biobank genetic samples.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

One Last Unexpected Lesson From the Life and Death of Queen Elizabeth II?

Ashby

2022

Bioethical Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

One Last Unexpected Lesson From the Life and Death of Queen Elizabeth II?

Ashby

2022

Bioethical Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Practices

Rubeis

2024

The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AI, Radical Ignorance, and the Institutional Approach to Consent

Steinberg

2024

Philos. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

More and more, we face AI-based products and services. Using these services often requires our explicit consent, e.g., by agreeing to the services’ Terms and Conditions clause. Current advances introduce the ability of AI to evolve and change its own modus operandi over time in such a way that we cannot know, at the moment of consent, what it is in the future to which we are now agreeing. Therefore, informed consent is impossible regarding certain kinds of AI. Call this the problem of radical ignorance. Interestingly, radical ignorance exists in consent contexts other than AI, where it seems that individuals can provide informed consent. The article argues that radical ignorance can undermine informed consent in some contexts but not others because, under certain institutional, autonomy-protecting conditions, consent can be valid without being (perfectly) informed. By understanding these institutional conditions, we can formulate practical solutions to foster valid, albeit imperfectly informed consent across various decision contexts and within different institutions.

show abstract

Blanket Consent and Trust in the Biobanking Context

Cited by 5 publications

References 19 publications

One Last Unexpected Lesson From the Life and Death of Queen Elizabeth II?

One Last Unexpected Lesson From the Life and Death of Queen Elizabeth II?

Practices

AI, Radical Ignorance, and the Institutional Approach to Consent

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About