2002
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.73.5.739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blasting and Other Mining-related Activities in Kentucky: A Source of Earthquake Misidentification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three-component phased array aids considerably in this process by unambiguous identification of surface waves characterized by low phase velocities relative to P and S. Thus, although explosions outnumber natural events by more than 10 to 1, we are confident that we have minimized the contamination of the catalog by explosions as much as is reasonably possible. On the other hand, as Street et al (2002) point out, the discrimination process can probably never be made foolproof. The most likely problems with this discrimination method are events well outside the network where blockage of surface waves (strong attenuation by scattering at a near-vertical structural boundary) is a strong possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three-component phased array aids considerably in this process by unambiguous identification of surface waves characterized by low phase velocities relative to P and S. Thus, although explosions outnumber natural events by more than 10 to 1, we are confident that we have minimized the contamination of the catalog by explosions as much as is reasonably possible. On the other hand, as Street et al (2002) point out, the discrimination process can probably never be made foolproof. The most likely problems with this discrimination method are events well outside the network where blockage of surface waves (strong attenuation by scattering at a near-vertical structural boundary) is a strong possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin times of the events are randomly distributed through the hours of the day (Pope, 1999), while events we have classified as explosions show the typical strongly peaked distribution during daylight hours (e.g., Street et al, 2002).…”
Section: Magnitude-frequency Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all regions, we made a more extensive effort for the 2002 maps to remove quarry blasts and other explosions from the earthquake catalog before calculating the seismicity parameters. For example, we removed blasts for the Kentucky catalog using the report of Street et al (2002). In other cases we used additional information from the National Earthquake Information Center to identify suspected blasts in the catalog.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A careful analysis of all the undetected events has been carried out to exclude those related to artificial sources. Quarry blasts can often be distinguished from natural seismicity according to features such as lower frequency content, a well developed dispersive wave train, a large P-to S-wave amplitude and time and local repetition (Street et al, 2002). Considering these features, more than 50 events have not been included in the final catalogue.…”
Section: On-land Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%