2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51280-4_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BLAZE: Practical Lattice-Based Blind Signatures for Privacy-Preserving Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A kind of signature that requires interaction is blind signature, where a user wants to obtain a signature by a signer on some message m, without the signer obtaining any information about the message m. Currently, in the setting of lattice-based blind signatures, the tree of commitments technique introduced in [4] to reduce the abort probability has been successfully used a couple of times, first in the same paper [4] as an improvement of the signature scheme BLAZE [3] and then in [16] to construct a provably-secure (in contrast to BLAZE and BLAZE+) but inefficient scheme which involves three rounds of communication.…”
Section: Settings Where Our Results Is Not Usefulmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A kind of signature that requires interaction is blind signature, where a user wants to obtain a signature by a signer on some message m, without the signer obtaining any information about the message m. Currently, in the setting of lattice-based blind signatures, the tree of commitments technique introduced in [4] to reduce the abort probability has been successfully used a couple of times, first in the same paper [4] as an improvement of the signature scheme BLAZE [3] and then in [16] to construct a provably-secure (in contrast to BLAZE and BLAZE+) but inefficient scheme which involves three rounds of communication.…”
Section: Settings Where Our Results Is Not Usefulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µ , z (3) ). Repeating this argument µ times, letting P Π send a (i) i to its verifier V Π in round i, getting c i as answer and rewinding P Σ accordingly, at the end we eventually finish, after µ + 1 executions of P Σ , with a valid transcript (a…”
Section: Soundnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [3], blindness is formalised based on an indistinguishability game. An adversary A (acting as a signer) chooses a secret key/public key pair (sk, pk) and two messages 0 , 1 , and then interacts with two requesters: one who requests a signature on 0 , and one who requests a signature on 1 .…”
Section: Empowering Scriptless Blockchain: Adaptor Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ethereum 2.0 upgrade 2 is expected to support some quantum-safe cryptographic tools. Moreover, Algorand has recently introduced state proofs 3 , where a post-quantum signature scheme (based on lattice problems) is used. Beyond these, we are not aware of a large-scale adoption of PQ tools in the blockchain setting and hope our work will pave the way towards a wider adoption of PQ cryptography for blockchain applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%