2018
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bleeding in Locally Invasive Pelvic Malignancies: Is Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy a Safe and Effective Non-Invasive Option for Securing Hemostasis? A Single Institution Perspective

Abstract: Introduction: Control of bleeding due to locally invasive disease is of paramount importance in the management of cancer patients. This study was undertaken to explore the outcomes of palliative intent hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) in advanced stage pelvic malignancies that presented with bleeding.Methods: This study enrolled patients treated with palliative intent hypofractionated radiation therapy from July 2015 to November 2017. In the inclusion criteria, all these patients had the common present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In data analyzing specific tumor sites , Shuja et al report 57% (n = 24) of patients reaching complete bleeding control and 31% (n = 13) partial response in a cohort of malignant pelvic tumors [ 32 ]. Lacarrière et al [ 12 ] and Tey et al [ 33 ] analyzed RT for hematuria in bladder-cancer; Zhang et al [ 34 ] for urothelial cancer, documenting freedom of hematuria at the end of RT in 69% (n = 28), 76% (n = 39) and 88% (n = 22), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In data analyzing specific tumor sites , Shuja et al report 57% (n = 24) of patients reaching complete bleeding control and 31% (n = 13) partial response in a cohort of malignant pelvic tumors [ 32 ]. Lacarrière et al [ 12 ] and Tey et al [ 33 ] analyzed RT for hematuria in bladder-cancer; Zhang et al [ 34 ] for urothelial cancer, documenting freedom of hematuria at the end of RT in 69% (n = 28), 76% (n = 39) and 88% (n = 22), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%