Background
Although flow cytometry is often brought forward as a preferable method in the setting of thrombocytopenia, the relative effects of low sample counts on results from flow cytometry‐based platelet function testing (
FC
‐
PFT
) in comparison with light transmission aggregometry (
LTA
) and multiple electrode aggregometry (
MEA
) has not been reported.
Objectives
To compare the effects of different sample platelet counts (10, 50, 100, and 200 × 10
9
L
−1
) on platelet activation measured with
FC
‐
PFT
,
LTA
, and
MEA
using the same anticoagulant and agonist concentrations as for the commercial
MEA
test.
Methods
Platelets were stimulated with two commonly used platelet agonists (
ADP
[6.5 μmol L
−1
] and
PAR
1‐
AP
[
TRAP
, 32 μmol L
−1
]). The specified sample platelet counts were obtained by combining platelet‐rich and platelet poor hirudinized plasma in different proportions with or without red blood cells.
Results
For
FC
, P‐selectin exposure and
PAC
‐1 binding was reduced at 10 × 10
9
L
−1
after stimulation with
PAR
1‐
AP
(by approximately 20% and 50%, respectively), but remained relatively unchanged when
ADP
was used as agonist (n = 9). The platelet count‐dependent effects observed with
PAR
1‐
AP
were eliminated when samples were pre‐incubated with apyrase, implying that reduced purinergic signaling was the main underlying factor (n = 5). Both aggregometry‐based
PFT
s showed a 50% reduction at 50 × 10
9
L
−1
and more than 80% reduction at 10 × 10
9
L
−1
, irrespective of agonist used (n = 7).
Conclusions
Although
FC
‐
PFT
is generally preferable to aggregometry‐based
PFT
s in situations with low sample platelet counts, a careful optimization of experimental parameters is still required in order to eliminate platelet count‐related effects.