2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blended controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer with straw returning improved soil nitrogen availability, soil microbial community, and root morphology of wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The straw can be cut into small pieces and left in the soil. The straw retained in the farmland can increase the storage of organic carbon and nitrogen, so it is possible to improve crop productivity [77,78]. Of course, straw returning has some disadvantages [79], but the rational use of straw returning technology is conducive to improving soil quality and increasing yield, which has been verified in the North China Plain [80].…”
Section: Variable Description 431 Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The straw can be cut into small pieces and left in the soil. The straw retained in the farmland can increase the storage of organic carbon and nitrogen, so it is possible to improve crop productivity [77,78]. Of course, straw returning has some disadvantages [79], but the rational use of straw returning technology is conducive to improving soil quality and increasing yield, which has been verified in the North China Plain [80].…”
Section: Variable Description 431 Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Origin software was used to determine the determinants on the application of different fertilizations in impacting maize yield and PUE using the chord diagram, principal component analysis, and Spearman’s correlation analysis ( Hou et al, 2019 ; Li R. C. et al, 2021 ). With the exception of the control treatment, data were collected and divided into four categories: (1) uncoated DAP treatments (Un-P; the mean value of P 100% and P 80% treatments); (2) coated DAP treatments (CP; the mean value of CP 100% and CP 80% treatments); (3) uncoated DAP combined with HA treatments (P + HA; the mean value of P 100% + HA and P 80% + HA treatments); (4) coated DAP combined with HA treatments (CP + HA; the mean value of CP 100 % + HA and CP 80% +HA treatments).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the agroecosystems, soil microbial communities coexist in multitrophic microbial food webs, which directly or indirectly affect crop health and yield ( Nihorimbere et al, 2011 ; Fan et al, 2020b ; Yu et al, 2021 ). Especially in the rhizosphere (root-soil interface), the zone of soil surrounding plant roots represents a hotspot of microbial and biochemical activity ( York et al, 2016 ; Kuzyakov and Razavi, 2019 ; Li R. et al, 2021 ). Soil microorganisms are structured and form complex food webs, reflecting strong interrelationships within ecological networks, which is fundamental for characterizing species interactions and dynamics of ecosystems ( Fan et al, 2021 ; Yuan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. et al (2021) found that a blend of regular and controlled-release urea increased the relative abundance of Penicillium and Aspergillus fungal genera and reduced the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) of nitrifying bacteria of the genus Nitrospira compared to regular urea treatment. The bacterial and fungi α diversity in a blend of regular and controlled-release urea treatment was lower than the regular urea treatment ( Li R. et al, 2021 ). Lupwayi et al (2010) found that the controlled-release urea increased microbial biomass carbon (MBC) or functional diversity more than urea in 3 site-years, but the opposite was observed in 1 site-year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation