Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study

Abstract

BackgroundBlending online modules into face-to-face therapy offers perspectives to enhance patient self-management and to increase the (cost-)effectiveness of therapy, while still providing the support patients need. The aim of this study was to outline optimal usage of blended care for depression, according to patients and therapists.MethodsA Delphi method was used to find consensus on suitable blended protocols (content, sequence and ratio). Phase 1 was an explorative phase, conducted in two rounds of online questionnaires, in which patients’ and therapists’ preferences and opinions about online psychotherapy were surveyed. In phase 2, data from phase 1 was used in face-to-face interviews with therapists to investigate how blended therapy protocols could be set up and what essential preconditions would be.ResultsTwelve therapists and nine patients completed the surveys. Blended therapy was positively perceived among all respondents, especially to enhance the self-management of patients. According to most respondents, practical therapy components (assignments, diaries and psycho-education) may be provided via online modules, while process-related components (introduction, evaluation and discussing thoughts and feelings), should be supported face-to-face. The preferred blend of online and face-to-face sessions differs between therapists and patients; most therapists prefer 75% face-to-face sessions, most patients 50 to 60%. The interviews showed that tailoring treatment to individual patients is essential in secondary mental health care, due to the complexity of their problems. The amount and ratio of online modules needs to be adjusted according to the patient’s problems, skills and characteristics. Therapists themselves should also develop skills to integrate online and face-to-face sessions.ConclusionsBlending online and face-to-face sessions in an integrated depression therapy is viewed as a positive innovation by patients and therapists. Following a standard blended protocol, however, would be difficult in secondary mental health care. A database of online modules could provide flexibility to tailor treatment to individual patients, which asks motivation and skills of both patients and therapists. Further research is necessary to determine the (cost-)effectiveness of blended care, but this study provides starting points and preconditions to blend online and face-to-face sessions and create a treatment combining the best of both worlds.

Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions

“…To maximize clinician engage-ment, clinicians should be confident that the intervention extends and complements their ability to provide effi-cient and effective care. 65 Few studies have taken a holistic approach toward designing for service delivery, in addition to designing for the individual recipient of the intervention. There is an urgent need for techniques to co-design DBCIs so that they reengineer clinician-patient-family interactions to improve engagement.…”

Computer and psychotherapy – do they fit?

“…In einer mehrstufigen Delphi-Befragung unter niederländischen Patienten und Psychotherapeuten, die bereits Erfahrungen mit gemischter Psychotherapie bei der Behandlung von Depression hatten, gingen van der Vaart et al (2014) der Frage nach dem optimalen Verschnitt computerisierter und klassischer Interventionsstrategien sowie möglicher Vor-und Nachteile gemischter Psychotherapie nach. Beide Gruppen (12 Psychotherapeuten; 8 Patienten) stimmten weitgehend darin überein, dass sich v. a. Übungen für Zuhause, Stimmungs-und Aktivitätstagebücher sowie Psychoedukation und Erinnerungsnachrichten gut über die Online-Plattform abwickeln ließen.…”

Web-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Blended with Face-to-Face Sessions for Major Depression: a Randomized Clinical Trial (Preprint)

“…This blended format can be beneficial by tailoring sessions to meet patient-specific needs during therapist delivered sessions, over and above the computerized program [17,18]. In addition, blend CBT aids in improving efficiency by allowing therapists to focus more on process-related treatment components (e.g., treatment introduction, evaluation, discussing thoughts and feelings, asking questions about homework) in their therapist delivered sessions, while more practical therapy components, such as psychoeducation, mood and activity diaries and homework can be done through the computerized program [18].…”