2022
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1034373
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blinatumomab for treating pediatric B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A retrospective real-world study

Abstract: ObjectivesBlinatumomab was shown to be safe and effective for consolidation therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of blinatumomab in pediatric B-ALL patients in a real-world setting.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational study that included patients who initiated blinatumomab treatment between October 1, 2020 and June 20, 2022. Patients with B-ALL diagnosis, age below 18 years, and at least one blinatumomab treatment cycle w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trials are underway testing the benefit of Blina in first-line treatment of CYP with B-ALL (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03643276, NCT03914625), but as an addition rather than a replacement for intensive phases of chemotherapy backbones. Our results and those of other small case series [25][26][27][28] in patients with chemotherapy intolerance provide a strong argument for testing the latter strategy for all CYP with B-ALL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Trials are underway testing the benefit of Blina in first-line treatment of CYP with B-ALL (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03643276, NCT03914625), but as an addition rather than a replacement for intensive phases of chemotherapy backbones. Our results and those of other small case series [25][26][27][28] in patients with chemotherapy intolerance provide a strong argument for testing the latter strategy for all CYP with B-ALL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%