1989
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.73.2.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind and partial sight registration in Avon.

Abstract: SUMMARY All blind and partially sighted registration forms for the county of Avon for a two-year period were analysed, and the findings are presented. Comparisons with the national figure published by Sorsby over 20 years ago show there has been no marked change in the rates of blind registration per 100 000 population with the exception of those for cataract, which show a large reduction. Diabetic registrations have remained similar, but this may represent an encouraging trend in view of the significant incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
51
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Registration for blindness and partial sight Owing to ARMD appears to be increasing as a proportion of overall registrations (Sorsby 1955(Sorsby -1960 26.9%; Ghafour 1980: 29.8%; Avon study [1985][1986]: 49%; present study 1996-1997: 52.4%). 1,2,5,10 In the present study, as age increases, the number of patients registered blind per 100 000 population Owing to ARMD increases from 39.3 in the age group 65-to 74-year olds to 288 in 85-year olds and over.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Registration for blindness and partial sight Owing to ARMD appears to be increasing as a proportion of overall registrations (Sorsby 1955(Sorsby -1960 26.9%; Ghafour 1980: 29.8%; Avon study [1985][1986]: 49%; present study 1996-1997: 52.4%). 1,2,5,10 In the present study, as age increases, the number of patients registered blind per 100 000 population Owing to ARMD increases from 39.3 in the age group 65-to 74-year olds to 288 in 85-year olds and over.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Studies showing that blindness from glaucoma occurring at an increasingly later age attribute this to an improvement in glaucoma treatment methods. 8,13 It has been estimated that the mean time from initial visual field defect to death was 12.8 years in white European patients, suggesting that in the majority of treated glaucoma patients, the rate of progression of visual field loss should not lead to blindness in their lifetime. 14,15 Our results confirm that the majority of treated POAG patients in Norfolk will not go blind before death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] It is estimated that glaucoma is the second leading cause of visual loss worldwide, and is responsible for up to 17% of blind and partial sight registration in the United Kingdom. 1,[8][9][10][11] A newly diagnosed POAG patient will have concerns about the future. Will their eyesight remain good enough to retain their driving licence?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of acquired blindness among the elderly in the developed countries (Leibowitz et al 1980;Klein & Klein 1982;Martinez et al 1982;Ferris 1983;Cullinan 1987;Ghafour et al 1988; Thompson & Rosenthal 1989;Grey et al 1989). Tears of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) have been described as a variance of presentation or as a complication of AMD (Hoskin et al 1981;Coscas et al 1982;Cantril et al 1983;Decker et al 1983;De Laey & Riems 1984;Green & Yarian 1983;Tutein Noltenius & Deutman 1985;Krishan et al 1985;Giovannini et al 1987;Haller Yeo et al 1988;Nisha et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%