2010
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2010.03.080624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind carrier phase acquisition and tracking for 8-VSB signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the same period, under the context of carrier phase recovery, the fourth-order statistics appeared as an adaptive solution for phase recovery in [7,[23][24][25]. More recent work (during 2000-2010) can be found in [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] where similar fourth-order statistics are presented for adaptive phase recovery in VSB systems. As far as the analysis is concerned, the link between the steady-state estimates of FP-PRA and decision-directed loop is established in [18].…”
Section: Existing Adaptive Phase Recovery Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the same period, under the context of carrier phase recovery, the fourth-order statistics appeared as an adaptive solution for phase recovery in [7,[23][24][25]. More recent work (during 2000-2010) can be found in [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] where similar fourth-order statistics are presented for adaptive phase recovery in VSB systems. As far as the analysis is concerned, the link between the steady-state estimates of FP-PRA and decision-directed loop is established in [18].…”
Section: Existing Adaptive Phase Recovery Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that we have not made any approximation in (32); it is an exact expression for the evaluation of MSD. There are two random variables (x k and ψ k ) involved in (32), so we require conditional means for the evaluation of moments as given by…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the transmitted symbols are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) discrete uniform random variables, we can ignore the dependency on all of the previous time states and the sampling density can be rewritten as (16) where N (μ, σ 2 ) denotes the Gaussian distribution with mean μ and variance σ 2 , X m is one of the possible transmitted symbols of the modulation alphabet, X = {X 1 , X 2 , . .…”
Section: B Importance Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a communication system with a Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) modulation and an AWGN channel. Note that AWGN channel is considered by many authors in the synchronization context [15], [16] . The random frequency offset is assumed to be uniformly distributed in the range (−0.48, 0.48), i.e., approximately full acquisition range acquisition.…”
Section: F Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%