1999
DOI: 10.1109/58.764843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind deconvolution of ultrasonic traces accounting for pulse variance

Abstract: The ability of pulse-echo measurements to resolve closely spaced reflectors is limited by the duration of the ultrasonic pulse. Resolution can be improved by deconvolution, but this often fails because frequency selective attenuation introduces unknown changes in the pulse shape. In this paper we propose a maximum a posteriori algorithm for simultaneous estimation of a time varying pulse and high-resolution deconvolution. A priori information is introduced to encourage estimates where the pulse varies only slo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deconvolution can be divided into two minimization problems: i) "pure" deconvolution where signal is treated as convolution of test object reflectivity function with probing (reference) signal [10][11][12] and ii) reference signal production [18,19,23]. Deconvolution is the optimization problem that uses sparse deconvolution methods such as matching pursuit, Prony model or orthogonal matching pursuit in order to deconvolve the mixed data [5,6,15,16].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Parameters Of The Approximating Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deconvolution can be divided into two minimization problems: i) "pure" deconvolution where signal is treated as convolution of test object reflectivity function with probing (reference) signal [10][11][12] and ii) reference signal production [18,19,23]. Deconvolution is the optimization problem that uses sparse deconvolution methods such as matching pursuit, Prony model or orthogonal matching pursuit in order to deconvolve the mixed data [5,6,15,16].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Parameters Of The Approximating Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with noise present, this significantly degrades the results of deconvolution. Blind deconvolution [17,18] is offering a production of reference signal using some simple mathematical model function, Gabor (harmonic oscillation with Gaussian envelope) being the most frequently used [6,19]. Result of such deconvolution significantly improves the SNR, adapts the signal spectral content changes and significantly reduces the required amount of computer memory needed to store or transmit the acquired data [20] by compressive sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…superimposed on a scanty structure of a few strong specular reflectors (e.g., liver arterioles, organ boundaries, etc. ), the corresponding tissue reflectivity function is likely to be a sparse sequence [28]. Such a behavior of the reflectivity function can be effectively described using a Laplacian distribution, as it has long been done in numerous applications in signal processing [29]- [32].…”
Section: B Statistical Modeliing Of the Reflectivity Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a quality measure, we will use the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) criterion defined as (28) where y and denote the desired quantity and its estimate, respectively. In this paper, the expectation in (28) has been estimated based on the results of 200 independent trials.…”
Section: A In Silico Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later a more flexible linear algebra approach involving finite-impulse response matrices was introduced [5]. This approach has been used in ultrasonic applications for deconvolving A-scans acquired from layered structures [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%