2005
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2005.845477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind equalization for correlated input symbols: A Bussgang approach

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of blind equalization in the case of correlated input symbols, and it shows how the knowledge of the symbol sequence probability distribution can be directly incorporated in a Bussgang blind equalization scheme. Numerical results pertaining to both linear and nonlinear modulation schemes show that a significant improvement in equalization performance is obtained by exploiting the symbol sequence probability distribution using the approach herein described

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The matrix n 1 has the vector of eigenvalues [1.5000, 1.2000 1 . Like previous references [28][29][30][31][45][46][47], the colored noise vector n 1 ∼ CN (0, σ 2 1 n 1 ) is generated as…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The matrix n 1 has the vector of eigenvalues [1.5000, 1.2000 1 . Like previous references [28][29][30][31][45][46][47], the colored noise vector n 1 ∼ CN (0, σ 2 1 n 1 ) is generated as…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U 1 , U θ , V 1 , and V θ are unitary matrices, and 1 and θ are diagonal matrices of non-negative eigenvalues in descending order. In order to achieve a maximum oḟ I erg (B, F) in Problem (47), B and F should are in forms as:…”
Section: Suboptimal Structures For Source and Relay Precodersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, as indicated in [23], to simplify the evaluation of (8) the following two assumptions are here retained: The expectation in (8) is conditionally taken with respect to the last M equalizer outputs: truec^[n]=deftruec^[n],,truec^[n M + 1]normalTThe output of the FSE is assumed to satisfy the following additive white gaussian noise (AWGN) signal model: truec^[n]c[n]+w[n] being w[n] a realization of stationary white Gaussian random series of power scriptPw and statistically independent of bMPPM[n].…”
Section: Trained and Blind Fractionally Spaced Equalizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nonetheless, significant performance improvement is expected when the peculiar spectral redundancy of M PPM signals is properly taken into account in the equalizer design. One of the aims of this contribution is to show how the minimum mean square error (MMSE) form of the so-called Bussgang blind equalization technique, firstly presented in [20] and then extended in [21,22,23,24,25], can be also applied to the M PPM signal representations (1), (2), and (3). Specifically, in the sequel the following three major items will be addressed:The development of the MMSE nonlinearity that fully exploits the probabilistic description of the M PPM symbol formed as in (1);The proof of how the probabilistic description of the M PPM symbol (1) can be employed to recover the symbol timing;The introduction of a blind channel phase recovery technique that exploits the redundancy present in band-pass M PPM signals; it is worth highlighting that such a phase recovery stage is mandatory for band-pass transmission and coherent detection, and it is a critical step even in data aided (trained) equalization.…”
Section: Trained and Blind Fractionally Spaced Equalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation