2020 IEEE 30th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/mlsp49062.2020.9231822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Hierarchical Deconvolution

Abstract: Deconvolution is a fundamental inverse problem in signal processing and the prototypical model for recovering a signal from its noisy measurement. Nevertheless, the majority of model-based inversion techniques require knowledge on the convolution kernel to recover an accurate reconstruction and additionally prior assumptions on the regularity of the signal are needed. To overcome these limitations, we parametrise the convolution kernel and prior length-scales, which are then jointly estimated in the inversion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.1) of P and therefore must be estimated. Following Arjas et al (2020b), we solve the inverse problem of computing P in equation ( 7) in two parts (described in more detail in Sect. 4):…”
Section: Bayesian Hierarchical Model For Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3.1) of P and therefore must be estimated. Following Arjas et al (2020b), we solve the inverse problem of computing P in equation ( 7) in two parts (described in more detail in Sect. 4):…”
Section: Bayesian Hierarchical Model For Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be done for instance by available optimisation algorithms, such as the limited memory BFGS algorithm (Liu and Nocedal, 1989) implemented in the R function optim(), which computes the derivatives automatically by finite differences. This approach was taken in Arjas et al (2020b), but creates a computational bottleneck. In this study, to improve reconstruction times we specify the gradient of the target function explicitly for a more efficient computation, instead of time consuming finite-difference approximations of the gradients.…”
Section: Signal Recovery Via Optimisation and Mcmc Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An automatic system to optimise the length scales is thus desirable. In this paper we use hierarchical prior models following from Arjas et al (2020b) in deconvolu-tion of ISR power profiles in the presence of strong, narrow layers. Our aim is to study the performance of these prior models in deconvolution of ISR data and to show that they are a potential solution to the problem of variable length scales, without the need to explicitly control the weighting; that is, the length-scale estimate is adaptively estimated from the profiles during an efficient optimisation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automatic system to optimize the length-scales is thus desirable. In this paper we use hierarchical prior models following from Arjas et al (2020b) in deconvolution of ISR power profiles in presence of strong, narrow layers. Our aim is to study the performance of these prior models in deconvolution of ISR data and to show that they are a potential solution to the problem of variable length-scales, without the need to explicit control the weighting, that is, the length-scale estimate is adaptively estimated from the profiles during an efficient optimisation approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%