2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind identification of full-field vibration modes of output-only structures from uniformly-sampled, possibly temporally-aliased (sub-Nyquist), video measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, two cases were taken into account for the optimisation problems expressed by Equation (9). One was that the three modal frequencies were assumed to have the same variance and thus κ i = 1, and the other was that κ i = 0.56, 1.84, 0.6 calculated from monitored frequency variation.…”
Section: Global Fem Updatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, two cases were taken into account for the optimisation problems expressed by Equation (9). One was that the three modal frequencies were assumed to have the same variance and thus κ i = 1, and the other was that κ i = 0.56, 1.84, 0.6 calculated from monitored frequency variation.…”
Section: Global Fem Updatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41] Lately, phase-based video motion processing technique [42][43][44] has been explored to perform structural dynamics response (displacement) measurements and output-only modal identification without the need for installing markers or speckle paints on a structure's surface, [45][46][47][48][49][50][51] as required by traditional photogrammetry techniques. The recently developed technique enables extraction and visualization of full-field structural dynamic response and modal parameters at high spatial (pixel) resolution locations in an automated manner, 41,51 even with temporally aliased (sub-Nyquist) video measurements avoiding the need of using high-speed digital video cameras. 51 Ideally, full-field strains can then be directly computed from numerical differentiation of the estimated full-field displacements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently developed technique enables extraction and visualization of full-field structural dynamic response and modal parameters at high spatial (pixel) resolution locations in an automated manner, 41,51 even with temporally aliased (sub-Nyquist) video measurements avoiding the need of using high-speed digital video cameras. 51 Ideally, full-field strains can then be directly computed from numerical differentiation of the estimated full-field displacements. However, such a direct computation is extremely sensitive to noise (commonly Gaussian-type white noise), which is inevitably contained in the experimentally estimated full-field displacements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied blind source separation algorithm is able to extract the modal parameters automatically, so that user supervision and calibrating the input parameters are avoided. The same authors also investigated the effect of sub-Nyquist sampling on video measurements and the PME algorithm [39]. It has been also shown that using phase-based motion magnification as a pre-processing stage can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio in specific frequency bands for 3D DIC and 3DPT [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%