2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3035428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Image Watermarking for Localization and Restoration of Color Images

Abstract: Digital images have become easy to generate and share with tremendous growth in communication technology. Therefore, the threat of forgery and tampering in digital images has also been increased. This study proposes a blind fragile watermarking scheme for color images to provide efficient image tamper detection and self-recovery. A secret key based pseudo random binary sequence is used as a fragile watermark for tamper detection. Likewise, the recovery information is preserved in a randomized manner using a se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some recent papers that claim that their methods can recover the original image, after tampering rates of more than 50% [23][36] [37], but the required quality of their recovered images is not satisfied. For example, in [23] [36] the quality of their recovered images is less than 30dB even when the tampering rate is only around 30%. It is obvious for any method, the greater the tampering rate results in reduced quality for the recovered image, therefore the criteria are not met with their method beyond 30% tampering.…”
Section: Background Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some recent papers that claim that their methods can recover the original image, after tampering rates of more than 50% [23][36] [37], but the required quality of their recovered images is not satisfied. For example, in [23] [36] the quality of their recovered images is less than 30dB even when the tampering rate is only around 30%. It is obvious for any method, the greater the tampering rate results in reduced quality for the recovered image, therefore the criteria are not met with their method beyond 30% tampering.…”
Section: Background Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sinhal et al [10]. proposed an effective blind extraction and easy-to-detect watermarking scheme for color images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some techniques execute tampering detection at image level or patch level with CNN and then subjected for localization of tampering through sliding window analysis. Localization of Pixel or region‐level tampering has been proposed in recent days 27‐31 . Some of the techniques are based on discrete network structures, such as FCN, RCNN, LSTM, and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localization of Pixel or region-level tampering has been proposed in recent days. [27][28][29][30][31] Some of the techniques are based on discrete network structures, such as FCN, RCNN, LSTM, and so forth. A method known as Visual cryptography is primarily an addition of the concept called secret sharing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%