2011
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0094-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind individuals show pseudoneglect in bisecting numerical intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Blind and sighted adults were for example shown to present a classic SNARC effect in two numerical comparison tasks (to 5 and to 55) and in a parity judgment task (Castronovo & Seron, 2007a; Szücs & Csépe, 2005). In addition to presenting the same SNARC effect, blind and sighted people were also shown to present the same bisection effects in number bisection tasks (Cattaneo, Fantino, Silvanto, Tinti, & Vecchi, 2011;Rinaldi, Vecchi, Fantino, Merabet, & Cattaneo, 2015). When required to indicate (without calculating) the number midway between two others, healthy and blind responded with numbers smaller than the true midpoint (Cattaneo et al, 2011), an observation reflecting the tendency to over represent the left portion of space (i.e., pseudoneglect effect; see Jewell & McCourt, 2000).…”
Section: Interactions Between Number and Space In Individuals With Blmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Blind and sighted adults were for example shown to present a classic SNARC effect in two numerical comparison tasks (to 5 and to 55) and in a parity judgment task (Castronovo & Seron, 2007a; Szücs & Csépe, 2005). In addition to presenting the same SNARC effect, blind and sighted people were also shown to present the same bisection effects in number bisection tasks (Cattaneo, Fantino, Silvanto, Tinti, & Vecchi, 2011;Rinaldi, Vecchi, Fantino, Merabet, & Cattaneo, 2015). When required to indicate (without calculating) the number midway between two others, healthy and blind responded with numbers smaller than the true midpoint (Cattaneo et al, 2011), an observation reflecting the tendency to over represent the left portion of space (i.e., pseudoneglect effect; see Jewell & McCourt, 2000).…”
Section: Interactions Between Number and Space In Individuals With Blmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A growing set of data has indicated that early blindness does not preclude the elaboration of a semantic numerical representation (SNR) with similar spatial properties to those postulated in sighted people: a mental continuum oriented from left to right (Dehaene, 1997;Dehaene et al, 1993;Fias et al, 1996;Zorzi et al, 2006). Compared to sighted people, congenitally blind people show similar: distance, size and SNARC effects when submitted to numerical comparison (Castronovo and Seron, 2007a;Szücs and Csépe, 2005) and parity judgement tasks (Castronovo and Seron, 2007a); pseudoneglect (leftward bias) in numerical bisection task (Cattaneo et al, 2011); numerical spatial attentional shift in detection tasks (Salillas et al, 2009) and physical line bisection tasks (Cattaneo et al, 2010). Regarding the third property of SNR, its obedience to Weber's law (i.e., approximate numerical processing with increasing numerosity), congenitally blind participants' performances in numerical estimation tasks present as expected the signature to Weber's law (i.e., constant coefficients of variation across target size) (Castronovo and Seron, 2007b;Ferrand et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, new data in blind people suggest that this might not be the case (Castronovo and Seron, 2007a;Cattaneo et al, 2011;Salillas et al, 2009;Szücs and Csépe, 2005). More importantly, early visual deprivation seems to have a positive impact on numerical skills (Castronovo and Seron, 2007b;Ferrand et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans toutes ces tâches, les participants étaient plus rapides lorsque les petits stimulus étaient associés au bouton réponse gauche et les grands stimulus au bouton réponse situé à droite. Il a par ailleurs été démontré que les personnes aveugles et voyantes présentaient les mêmes effets de pseudonégligence [34,35]. En effet, dans une première étude [34], des adultes voyants et non-voyants étaient invités à explorer tactilement des tiges de différentes longueurs afin d'en indiquer le centre.…”
Section: Chez Les Non-voyantsunclassified
“…Il a par ailleurs été démontré que les personnes aveugles et voyantes présentaient les mêmes effets de pseudonégligence [34,35]. En effet, dans une première étude [34], des adultes voyants et non-voyants étaient invités à explorer tactilement des tiges de différentes longueurs afin d'en indiquer le centre. Au cours de certains essais, un petit (2) ou un grand (8) nombre était présenté oralement.…”
Section: Chez Les Non-voyantsunclassified